2002
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-002-0186-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of residual stress fields caused by shot peening

Abstract: In this article, the compressive residual stress field (CRSF) introduced by shot peening was studied comprehensively. The 40Cr steel, which is widely applied in industry materials, was used and shot peened under different conditions. The experimental results show that the maximum of compressive residual stress field for a given material is almost the same even under different shot peening techniques and the surface residual stress values are dependent on both the mechanical properties of target materials and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continuity condition requires the development of a compressive residual stress field (of typical depth 50 -500 µm) parallel to the free surface; a balancing tensile residual stress beneath this maintains force equilibrium in the component [7,8]. The magnitude and depth of the compressive residual stress field has been shown to be dependent on the peening process parameters [9] and target material [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuity condition requires the development of a compressive residual stress field (of typical depth 50 -500 µm) parallel to the free surface; a balancing tensile residual stress beneath this maintains force equilibrium in the component [7,8]. The magnitude and depth of the compressive residual stress field has been shown to be dependent on the peening process parameters [9] and target material [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High compressive residual stresses increased the fatigue property because it delays or stops the initiation and propagation of micro-cracks 12,13) . On the other hand, ne domain size and high dislocation density slowed down the dislocation gliding, to lead to an improvement on yield strength 14,15) , which was mentioned above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of interest was limited by a collimator to 1 mm 2 in area. Depth profiling was conducted step-by-step by removing a very thin layer of material (10,15,30,45 and final layer at 55 μm below the surface) in a 2 mm × 2 mm region by electropolishing. This experimental setup comply recommendations from standard SAE HS-784, 2003.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, the RSs are treated as mean biaxial stresses superimposed on the stress field produced by external loading, in the latter case, the RSs are included as R-ratio and crack closure effects. In the vast majority of cases, RSs are estimated through experimental measurements taken on flat unnotched coupons using laboratory incremental layer removal X-ray diffraction (XRD) [15,16], incremental blind hole drilling [17,18], synchrotron X-ray [19,20] or neutron diffraction [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%