2022
DOI: 10.32802/asmscj.2022.1289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Suicidal Ideation among Higher Education in Malaysia using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Abstract: Suicide can be defined as an act of self-injury with the intent to die. According to World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that more than 700 000 people end their life every year. Suicide becomes a critical social problem in recent years and it is one of the key reasons for death among university students. Generally, the prevalence of suicidal ideation among university students is ranged from 1.3% to 32.7% worldwide. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the risk factors for suicidal ideation amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, a pilot test is conducted, followed by the collection of data from quantitative students to use for pairwise comparison of job selection preferences. The AHP consistency value is then calculated by identifying the maximum Eigen value and computing the consistency ratio by dividing the consistency index by the random index(Teoh et al, 2022;Chan & Ch'ng, 2022). If the consistency ratio is equal or less than 0.1, the model is considered trustworthy, and the final ranking is valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a pilot test is conducted, followed by the collection of data from quantitative students to use for pairwise comparison of job selection preferences. The AHP consistency value is then calculated by identifying the maximum Eigen value and computing the consistency ratio by dividing the consistency index by the random index(Teoh et al, 2022;Chan & Ch'ng, 2022). If the consistency ratio is equal or less than 0.1, the model is considered trustworthy, and the final ranking is valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%