An Analysis of Shoulder Outcomes Scores in 275 Consecutive Patients: Disease-Specific Correlation Across Multiple Shoulder Conditions

Provencher, Matthew T.; Frank, Rachel M.; Macian, Diana; Dewing, Christopher B.; Ghodadra, Neil; Carney, Joseph; LeClere, Lance E.; Solomon, Daniel J.

doi:10.7205/milmed-d-11-00234

Cited by 28 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They found a high correlation among SANE, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index for SLAP and instability and rotator cuff repairs, but no significant correlation between SANE and ASES. 21 Interestingly, their study group consisted of a relatively young and athletic population, mostly male individuals, with higher demands than those of the general population of all ages that we included in the present study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The same authors then compared it with the Lysholm score in knee anterior cruciate ligament injuries and also found a significant degree of correlation. 20 In a recent study, Provencher et al 21 examined 275 young active military patients with various shoulder conditions. They found a high correlation among SANE, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index for SLAP and instability and rotator cuff repairs, but no significant correlation between SANE and ASES.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair

Cunningham

Lädermann

Denard

et al. 2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair

Cunningham

Lädermann

Denard

et al. 2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Previous studies have explored how endpoint numerical scores correlate between each other, with varied success. [8][9][10]19 Razmjou et al 9 investigated the association between CS Scores and other outcome scores: Western 10 Thus, it could be deduced that the correlation between endpoint of outcome scores can often be unreliable and therefore this highlights the opportunity to construct and review our novel method of obtaining shoulder outcome scores. The present study presents high ICC values (0.869 to 0.930) with narrow confidence intervals (0.833 to 0.955), indicative of good reliability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous studies have attempted to overcome this inconvenience by correlating endpoint scores, although this has met with varying success. [8][9][10] Furthermore, this method does not allow for the extraction of numerical scores but, instead, merely the likelihood of a poor outcome in one scoring system associating with a poor outcome in another.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The combined shoulder assessment: a convenient method for obtaining equivalent outcome scores

Torrance¹,

Hallam²,

Walton

et al. 2017

Shoulder & Elbow

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Outcome scores are useful tools with respect to quantifying how pain and limitations in strength and movement affect the patient's functionality and lifestyle. Three shoulder outcome methods [Oxford, Constant and QuickDASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand)] are commonly used in practice but collectively consist of 34 questions, taking approximately 7 min to complete. We have developed a concise shoulder assessment to derive three equivalent outcome scores in a 12-item patient-reporting questionnaire. Methods: Outcome scores from 1285 outpatients of an upper limb clinic were collected. The patient cohort consisted of 462 females and 823 males with a mean (SD) age of 47.2 (16.79) years (range 13 years to 90 years). Using a correlation matrix, a 12-item questionnaire was drafted. The combined shoulder assessment was validated by 227 patients; consisting of 101 females and 126 males with a mean (SD) age of 47.91 (16.63) years (range 13 years to 88 years). Results: Agreement was achieved between the two methods, with an equivalent Oxford Shoulder Score intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.930, equivalent Constant Shoulder Score ICC of 0.942 and equivalent QuickDASH ICC of 0.869. Bland-Altman analyses showed no systematic differences. Large effect sizes highlighted the responsiveness to change. Conclusions: The new combined shoulder assessment is a more convenient and patient-friendly method to obtain equivalent Oxford, Constant and QuickDASH shoulder outcome scores.

show abstract

“…The score has been validated and utilized for disorders of the shoulder. 8,20 The SANE score has also been shown to have moderate to strong positive correlations with the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee surveys for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or knee arthroscopy procedures. 21 However, this outcome measure is less commonly used to evaluate pathology of the lower extremity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score as an Outcome Measure by Comparison to the Revised Foot Function Index (rFFI)

Bellas

Cirino

Cote

et al. 2019

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures serve as an invaluable tool in both the clinical and research setting to monitor a patient’s condition and efficacy of treatments over time. We aim to validate the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score for disorders of the lower extremity using the revised–Foot Function Index (rFFI) as a reference. The SANE score is a 1-question survey that may improve efficiency of outcome data collection in the clinical setting. Methods: Patient age, sex, visit diagnosis by ICD-10 code, SANE score, and rFFI score were collected retrospectively from 218 initial patient encounters between January 2015 through July 2017. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older and were excluded if they had incomplete SANE or rFFI data. Results of the two scores were compared using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, with correlation defined as excellent (>0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.7), good (0.4-0.6), or poor (0.2-0.39). Diagnoses were categorized into 9 subgroups that were analyzed, including forefoot, plantar fasciitis, arthritis, deformity, fracture, tendinitis, osteochondral defect (OCD) of the talus, acute soft tissue trauma, and “other.” Results: The SANE score had good correlation with the overall rFFI score ( r = 0.51, P < .01). When comparing the SANE score to the rFFI subscores, there was good correlation with pain ( r = 0.42, P < .01), good correlation with stiffness ( r = 0.44, P < .01), poor correlation with activity ( r = 0.36, P <.01), good correlation with difficulty ( r = 0.52, P < .01), and poor correlation with social issues ( r = 0.39, P < .01). Subanalysis showed an excellent-good correlation between SANE and rFFI score for forefoot pathology ( r = 0.67, P < .01) and plantar fasciitis ( r = 0.63, P < .02), good correlation for arthritis ( r = 0.49, P < .04), deformity ( r = 0.60, P < .01), fracture ( r = 0.50, P < .01), and tendinitis ( r = 0.47, P < .02), and no significant correlation for OCD of the talus ( r = 0.56, P < .15) and acute soft tissue trauma ( r = 0.19, P < .32). Conclusion: The SANE score demonstrates excellent-good correlation with the rFFI for specific pathology including the forefoot and plantar fasciitis and has limited correlation with other pathology.

show abstract

An Analysis of Shoulder Outcomes Scores in 275 Consecutive Patients: Disease-Specific Correlation Across Multiple Shoulder Conditions

Abstract: Our findings may be utilized as a baseline to compare and track patient-derived disability across multiple shoulder conditions and serve to define mean diagnosis-specific shoulder patient preoperative scores.

Cited by 28 publications

References 71 publications

Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair

Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair

The combined shoulder assessment: a convenient method for obtaining equivalent outcome scores

Validation of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score as an Outcome Measure by Comparison to the Revised Foot Function Index (rFFI)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About