2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of Stafford loan repayment burdens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when a customer manage to have good record of current assets, customers may be expected to have better capabilities to pay their loans. The results of this study are consistent with other existing studies in the literature (Behr & Sonnekalb, 2012;Hill & Sarangi, 2012;Chapman & Liu, 2013;Baland et al, 2013;Vu et al, 2015;Chapman & Lounkaew, 2015).…”
Section: The Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, when a customer manage to have good record of current assets, customers may be expected to have better capabilities to pay their loans. The results of this study are consistent with other existing studies in the literature (Behr & Sonnekalb, 2012;Hill & Sarangi, 2012;Chapman & Liu, 2013;Baland et al, 2013;Vu et al, 2015;Chapman & Lounkaew, 2015).…”
Section: The Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Third, we are unsure of the extent to which social origin conditions the returns to graduate credentials by credential type. Due to repayment burdens, educational debt may reduce returns to investments for advanced degrees, even if labor market outcomes for advanced degree-holders are consistent across demographic groups (Chapman and Lounkaew 2015; College Board 2017a; Dynarski and Scott-Clayton 2013). The amount and proportion of debt that will overburden graduates depend on multiple factors, including age, family responsibilities, other concurrent debts, and cost of living (Baum and Schwartz 2006).…”
Section: Graduate Student Debt and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the earnings equation we use unconditional quantile regression. As pointed out in Chapman and Lounkaew (2014) Women display on average lower earnings than men, and the gap is increasing along the income distribution, from slightly more than 5,000 euros a year when comparing men and women in the 25 th percentile, to more than 10,000 euros less per year when we compare men and women in the 75 th percentile ( Table 2). This result adds to previous Spanish evidence.…”
Section: Data and Estimated Modelmentioning
confidence: 60%