1964
DOI: 10.1037/h0044690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of summated generalization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth proposal for summation comes from stimulus sampling theory (Carterette, 1961;LaBerge and Martin, 1964). Here it is assumed that gradients will be linear on a properly scaled "substitutive" continuum, and summation reduces to an algebraic addition of the single S+ gradients up to a maximum given by the gradient peaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth proposal for summation comes from stimulus sampling theory (Carterette, 1961;LaBerge and Martin, 1964). Here it is assumed that gradients will be linear on a properly scaled "substitutive" continuum, and summation reduces to an algebraic addition of the single S+ gradients up to a maximum given by the gradient peaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6The Hullian formulation specifies that overlapping generalization tendencies will summate exponentially (Hull, 1943, Corollary 1, p. 199). A number of studies have examined generalization gradient combination (e.g., Blough, 1969; Carterette, 1961; Kalish & Guttman, 1957, 1959; LaBerge & Martin, 1964; Malone, 1974), but none has provided unequivocal support for a particular quantitative model of generalization summation. Given the lack of empirical unanimity and the Hullian model's rather conservative estimate of the contribution of generalized tendencies, we chose it for our simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%