2015
DOI: 10.1515/mms-2015-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis Of Tensile Test Results to Assess the Innovation Risk for an Additive Manufacturing Technology

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the innovation risk for an additive manufacturing process. The analysis was based on the results of static tensile tests obtained for specimens made of photocured resin. The assessment involved analyzing the measurement uncertainty by applying the FMEA method. The structure of the causes and effects of the discrepancies was illustrated using the Ishikawa diagram. The risk priority numbers were calculated. The uncertainty of the tensile test measurement was determined for thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1], the uncertainty of tensile strength measurements was calculated taking into account three directions of printing of test pieces made of photo-cured resin (Vero White). The test results were used to assess the innovation risks for additive manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], the uncertainty of tensile strength measurements was calculated taking into account three directions of printing of test pieces made of photo-cured resin (Vero White). The test results were used to assess the innovation risks for additive manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, material law implementation is not yet fully revisited leaving an open area for research in this direction [138]. A typical research direction would be to explore interfacial effect in terms of limited load transfer and damage kinetics at the light of results achieved for composite materials [139,140].…”
Section: Challenges For Am Topology Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of their manner of operation, they are divided into: electrically and mechanically operated, hand-or foot-operated, pneumatically operated via pressure increase/decrease, and spring operated valves. Taking the applied materials into consideration [1,2], valves are the most commonly classified as well into: aluminum valves, plastic valves, valves made of brass or other similar materials allowed in hazardous areas with risk of explosion, e.g. mines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%