2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36181-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Motion Signal Distributions Emerging from Locomotion through a Natural Environment

Abstract: Abstract. Some 50 years have passed since Gibson drew attention to the characteristic field of velocity vectors generated on the retina when an observer is moving through the three-dimensional world. Many theoretical, psychophysical, and physiological studies have demonstrated the use of such optic flowfields for a number of navigational tasks under laboratory conditions, but little is known about the actual flowfield structure under natural operating conditions. To study the motion information available to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there is a variation of local grating orientation, there always would be (spatially contiguous) regions that experience a 908 phase shift of the periodic patterns during the saccade öwhich naturally would create a strong motion signal in motion detectors receiving their input from those regions. This expected distribution of motion signals can easily be demonstrated by simulating a motion-detector network (cf Zanker 2001;Zanker and Zeil 2002). One recent computational study demonstrates that displacements of Riley patterns lead to characteristic motion-signal mapsöhorizontal streaks of motion signals in various directionsöwhich strongly resemble the perceived motion illusion (Zanker 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because there is a variation of local grating orientation, there always would be (spatially contiguous) regions that experience a 908 phase shift of the periodic patterns during the saccade öwhich naturally would create a strong motion signal in motion detectors receiving their input from those regions. This expected distribution of motion signals can easily be demonstrated by simulating a motion-detector network (cf Zanker 2001;Zanker and Zeil 2002). One recent computational study demonstrates that displacements of Riley patterns lead to characteristic motion-signal mapsöhorizontal streaks of motion signals in various directionsöwhich strongly resemble the perceived motion illusion (Zanker 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since this change in motion direction defines the location of the poles, direction profiles can be used to compare motion signal maps generated in different scenes, by asking how clearly poles can be detected in the direction profiles (cf. Zanker & Zeil 2002). We restrict our analysis here to a mainly qualitative inspection of motion signal maps and discuss later some ways of assessing them quantitatively.…”
Section: Analysing Motion Signal Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of assessing the quality of the information contained in the direction profiles is a very simple estimation procedure, which suggests that even sparse panoramic distributions are a very rich source of information (Zanker & Zeil 2002). The procedure is to fit a simple mathematical function to the data, which reflects the expectation of a basic directional profile.…”
Section: The Environment Emd-properties and Motion Signal Distributmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Implementation in software, either on a PC (Zanker & Zeil 2002) or on a microcontroller (Ruffier et al 2003) (2) Implementation in (dedicated) digital, analogue, or hybrid hardware, either based on VLSI or aVLSI ASICs (Harrison 2000(Harrison , 2004(Harrison , 2005 or implemented with standard ICs (Franceschini et al 1992) (3) Implementation in configurable hardware like FPAA (Field Programmable Analogue Array, Ruffier et al 2003) or FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array, Aubepart et al 2004, Zhang et al 2008 The first mentioned possibility has either the drawback of a high power consumption (PC) or does not have a suitable performance (microcontroller). The implementation in an ASIC, in contrast, can provide both a high performance and the best energy efficiency, but the drawback of an ASIC implementation is its reduced flexibility.…”
Section: Engineering Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%