1988
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2301_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Processes Influencing the Structured Dyadic Learning Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larson et al (1984) did not provide learners with written instruction during collaboration, but instead trained learners on the correct application of the script instructions prior to the actual collaborative learning phase. Hythecker et al (1988) state that the usual training time is about one hour.…”
Section: Collaboration Scripts For Face-to-face Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larson et al (1984) did not provide learners with written instruction during collaboration, but instead trained learners on the correct application of the script instructions prior to the actual collaborative learning phase. Hythecker et al (1988) state that the usual training time is about one hour.…”
Section: Collaboration Scripts For Face-to-face Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most script approaches are based on instructors that introduce and typically monitor how the script suggestions are meant to be applied. Apart from the fact that the introduction of scripts may take more time than the actual collaboration (see Hytecker, Dansereau, & Rocklin, 1988), teachers introducing and monitoring scripts may compromise the idea of self-guided, collaborative, distant learning and require face-to-face encounters. Typically, remote learners may not be able to participate in prior face-to-face training programs.…”
Section: Scripts In Computer-supported Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies (Gabbert, Johnson, & Johnson, 1986;Dansereau, 1988;Hythecker, Dansereau, & Rocklin, 1988;Larson, Dansereau, O'Donnell, Hythecker, Lambiotte, & Rocklin, 1985;McDonald, Larson, Dansereau, & Spurlin, 1985;Spurlin, Dansereau, Larson, & Brooks, 1984 ) approach CL by evaluating how well the cooperative facilitates access of knowledge for its individual members on subsequent transfer tasks. For these group-to-individual transfer studies, the original question of what counts for success in CL is reformulated to ask: "What are the conditions in group collaboration that lead to a group member's use of knowledge as an individual?"…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%