1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02110478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the relationship of teachers' reported use of classroom management strategies on types of classroom interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers may perceive that they might make a significant and meaningful difference in the educational outcomes of students with hidden or mild disabilities if they were to devote an inordinate amount of instructional focus and time to these students-as they likely feel regarding low-achieving nondisabled students. Conversely, it is speculated that teachers' concern toward included students with more severe and obvious disabilities, who teachers frequently nominated as not being prepared to discuss at a teacher-parent conference in the indifference category, is more akin to the parental nurturing that peers have been found to express toward their included classmates with severe disabilities (Evans et al, 1992;Evans, Salisbury, Palombaro, & Goldberg, 1994;Grenot-Scheyer, 1994;Hall, 1994 Jack, Shores, Denny, Gunter, DeBriere, & DePaepe, 1996;Kauffman & Wong, 1991).…”
Section: Explanation and Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Teachers may perceive that they might make a significant and meaningful difference in the educational outcomes of students with hidden or mild disabilities if they were to devote an inordinate amount of instructional focus and time to these students-as they likely feel regarding low-achieving nondisabled students. Conversely, it is speculated that teachers' concern toward included students with more severe and obvious disabilities, who teachers frequently nominated as not being prepared to discuss at a teacher-parent conference in the indifference category, is more akin to the parental nurturing that peers have been found to express toward their included classmates with severe disabilities (Evans et al, 1992;Evans, Salisbury, Palombaro, & Goldberg, 1994;Grenot-Scheyer, 1994;Hall, 1994 Jack, Shores, Denny, Gunter, DeBriere, & DePaepe, 1996;Kauffman & Wong, 1991).…”
Section: Explanation and Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, the amount of time spent in negative and positive interactions between teachers and students with behavior problems parallels the research on mother-child interactions. Specifically, teachers spent more than 20% of the time in negative interactions with students with behavior disorders and less than 5% of the time engaged in positive interactions with such students (Jack et al, 1996). Even though teachers have been found to be engaged in four times as many negative to positive interactions with these youth, other research has documented that the occurrence of aggression and noncompliance in children with behavior problems was relatively low and that children typically comply with teacher directives (Gunter & Coutinho, 1997).…”
Section: Classroom Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Yet, research suggests that most teachers use far more reprimands and reductive strategies than praise and positive procedures (Gunter, Denny, Jack, Shores, & Nelson, 1993;Gunter, Jack, DePaepe, Reed, & Harrison, 1994;Jack et al, 1996;Shores et al, 1993;Wehby et al, 1998). The effective instruction literature recommends that positive teacher-student interactions outnumber those that are negative by a ratio of at least 3:1 (see Gunter et al, 1998).…”
Section: Description Of the Programmentioning
confidence: 99%