2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00358-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a Screening Tool in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer

Abstract: Depression is difficult to diagnose in the terminally ill patient. As a result, it frequently is not treated. This has can have an adverse effect on quality of life and make the palliation of physical symptoms more difficult. In an effort to improve the detection of depression, many palliative care teams are using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale as a screening tool. The HAD was devised for use in general medical settings and has not been validated for use in palliative care patients. One hundre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
68
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcomes for this trial were symptoms of anxiety and depression as measured by the HADS. 57,58 Secondary outcomes included (1) 60 In addition, clinical assessments were made by trained clinicians on days 14 and 28 of the study. Patient ratings were performed by two research nurses and a physician who were trained to a high level of interrater reliability ( > 0.90), which was checked on a regular basis.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcomes for this trial were symptoms of anxiety and depression as measured by the HADS. 57,58 Secondary outcomes included (1) 60 In addition, clinical assessments were made by trained clinicians on days 14 and 28 of the study. Patient ratings were performed by two research nurses and a physician who were trained to a high level of interrater reliability ( > 0.90), which was checked on a regular basis.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that palliative care specialists, especially mental health professionals, distinguish between the despair indicative of an affective disorder associated with a pain magnitude that is disproportionate with disease state (e.g., symptom magnification) and the dysphoria that stems from diminished functional activity inherent in the disease process. Recent investigations into the etiological pathways of depression and determinants of quality of life in chronic illness are illuminating the interactions between physical and psychological conditions and offer the prospect of more effective pain management [2,[38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Psychological Aspects Of Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 While the HADS may be superior to other general psychological symptom measures (such as the General Health Questionnaire) in palliative care patients, 70,71 concerns regarding its sensitivity and specificity as a screening tool in palliative care have been raised. 69 Other anxiety measures are available, but have not been developed specifically for use in physically ill populations. An example is the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a 40-item measure, is widely used in other clinical fields, but has had less application in palliative care settings than the HADS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%