2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0261444817000155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools

Abstract: Abstract:This article explores three current, influential ELT curriculum approaches to the teaching of English in public sector schools at the primary and secondary level and how the theory of each approach translates into curriculum practice. These approaches are Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), genre-based pedagogy, and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). For consistency across approaches, the theoretical underpinnings of each will be briefly described according to a matrix of curriculum f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These norms, which are increasingly contested, have split English language teacher education (ELTE) across concerns of what Graves (2008) called ‘target-language embedded’ English teaching (referred to here as ‘ESL’) and those of ‘target-language removed’ global ELT. In fact, with the rapid creation of virtual contexts of use (among other venues), this distinction is fast becoming a continuum as Graves & Garton argue (2017). The hierarchical relation that Kachru (1982) outlined among the inner, expanding, and developing circles of English in the world no longer frames English ‘ownership’ as it did in 1998.…”
Section: (Then) 1998: a Work-driven Argument For The Knowledge-basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These norms, which are increasingly contested, have split English language teacher education (ELTE) across concerns of what Graves (2008) called ‘target-language embedded’ English teaching (referred to here as ‘ESL’) and those of ‘target-language removed’ global ELT. In fact, with the rapid creation of virtual contexts of use (among other venues), this distinction is fast becoming a continuum as Graves & Garton argue (2017). The hierarchical relation that Kachru (1982) outlined among the inner, expanding, and developing circles of English in the world no longer frames English ‘ownership’ as it did in 1998.…”
Section: (Then) 1998: a Work-driven Argument For The Knowledge-basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genre-Based Approach (GBA) has been widely used in the global context such as Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Indonesia, Brazil, Chile, Sweden, Denmark and some parts of the USA (Derewianka, 2012;Moore and Schleppegrell, 2014;Emilia and Hamied, 2015;Wu, 2016;Graves and Garton, 2017;Mbau and Sugeng, 2019) and typically found in monolingual education such as for second language or foreign language (Lorenzo, 2013). Within this wider practice of GBA, the use of cycles in teaching is popular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have focused on the issues that such a shift has raised, and especially the challenges for language teachers (see, for example, Copland, Garton & Burns, 2014). Graves and Garton (2017) note that there is often a gap between the principles of communicative curriculum reform and actual classroom practice, and identify both ideological and practical reasons for the gap. These reasons include socio-cultural appropriacy, clashes with teachers' beliefs and experience, large classes, lack of appropriate materials, and the impact of national examinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%