2011
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2010.2100048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytic Expression of Inductance Gradient for Rail-Type Electromagnetic Launcher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the magnetic flux density calculation at the load position, this study compares the proposed method with the surface current method [ 30 ] and the mean rail method [ 19 ] used in the previous literature. The surface current method simplifies the rail model based on the direction of the current flow, as shown in Figure 17 a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the magnetic flux density calculation at the load position, this study compares the proposed method with the surface current method [ 30 ] and the mean rail method [ 19 ] used in the previous literature. The surface current method simplifies the rail model based on the direction of the current flow, as shown in Figure 17 a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the rail current is only distributed on each surface, and the skin depth 𝛿 is evenly distributed. The current distributions on the upper and lower surfaces of the rail and armature are the same, while the current distribution coefficients on the inner and outer surfaces are 𝑓 and 𝑓 , respectively, where 𝑓 > 𝑓 , and 𝑓 + 𝑓 = 2 [21]. The current of rail surface S1 is:…”
Section: Calculation Model Of Magnetic Induction For the Armature And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they provide some initial understanding of the field distribution of EMRL. Based on the Biot-Savat law and considering the skin effect of current distribution, Nie et al derived the spatial magnetic field distribution of rectangular aperture [12]. Through parametric simulations, Keshtakar calculated the current density and magnetic flux density distribution of two-dimensional rail sections of different sizes [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%