An analytic hierarchy approach for intellectual capital

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present a methodological framework for the identification of a hierarchy among the three categories of intellectual capital, i.e. human, organizational/structural and relational capital, with respect to their contribution to the objective of improving a library's performance. It also seeks to provide a case study of Greek central public libraries.Design/methodology/approachThe framework is based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) application including utilization of a Delphi method and ISO 11620 international standards. Finally, empirical evidence is produced for the Greek central public libraries.FindingsThe proposed framework may be employed for prioritizing intangible assets in libraries. For the Greek central public libraries it has been indicated that human capital contributes more than the organizational/structural capital and this in turn more than the relational capital.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough the proposed methodological framework is intended to be widely applicable, the case study results cannot be directly generalized due to the uniqueness of the Greek public libraries environment.Practical implicationsA hierarchy may be an invaluable tool for the library's management in order to better utilize the intangible resources and effectively allocate investments to human, organizational and relation capital assets in order to improve the library's performanceOriginality/valueThe paper shows that the framework for building a hierarchy of intellectual capital in libraries is based on a rather challenging research approach for prioritizing intangible assets with respect to predefined management objectives.

A multi-methodology on building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of academics and practitioners for firms in Greece

“…The AHP was developed by Thomas Saaty in 1970 as a decision-making method. More specifically, with this methodology, someone can measure the relative importance between qualitative and quantifiable criteria (Ishizaka and Lusti, 2006;Vidal et al, 2011), and address multi-criteria decision-making problems of selection and prioritization (Asonitis and Kostagiolas, 2010).…”

Decision Making for Knowledge Management in the Tequila Sector: A Fuzzy Logic Model

“…AHP's popularity stems from its simplicity, flexibility, intuitive appeal, and ability to mix quantitative and qualitative criteria in the same framework. AHP has been applied to various decision problems focused on decision-making (Asonitis, 2010).…”

How Knowledge Assets Affect the Learning-by-Exporting Effect: Evidence Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Firms

“…Human capital expenditure comprises firms' spending on enhancing their employees' experience, skills, competence, attitude, creativity, and motivation [18,40,41]; this includes labor costs, executive salaries, bonuses, severance pay, retirement benefits, and stock compensation costs [37,38]. Structural capital expenditure comprises enterprises' spending on sustaining the generation and implementation of employees' valuable ideas in their works [39] by promoting the organization's learning, process, and information achievement [41,42]; this includes R&D spending, ordinary development costs, royalties, book purchasing and printing expenses, education and training costs, computer processing fees, and employee benefits [37,38]. Relational capital expenditure indicates firms' spending on the establishment and advancement of collaboration with external partners.…”

“…Relational capital expenditure indicates firms' spending on the establishment and advancement of collaboration with external partners. This expenditure enables them to exchange the information and expertise required to conduct innovation activities and overcome the innovation-related risks [43], enhance their brand value and reputation by meeting customer needs and expectations, and perform various marketing activities [41,42,44]; it includes export costs, sales promotion costs, sales commissions, other selling expenses, entertainment fees, advertising costs, storage fees, sample fees, packing costs, carrying costs, overseas market development costs, and customer service costs [37,38].…”