2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytic network process model for risk quantification of mega construction projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANP is a reform of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) used in multicriteria decision-making problems (Oktari et al, 2023). ANP is modeled as a network structure composed of numerous components (criteria and alternatives) organized into groups and linked to one another based on the influence of the components (Erol et al, 2022). Pairwise comparisons were applied to assess the relative importance between the two criteria using a scale of 1-9, that indicated equally important (1), weakly more important (3), strongly more important (5), very strongly more important (7), and extremely more important (9).…”
Section: Analytical Network Process (Anp) and Analytical Hierarchy Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANP is a reform of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) used in multicriteria decision-making problems (Oktari et al, 2023). ANP is modeled as a network structure composed of numerous components (criteria and alternatives) organized into groups and linked to one another based on the influence of the components (Erol et al, 2022). Pairwise comparisons were applied to assess the relative importance between the two criteria using a scale of 1-9, that indicated equally important (1), weakly more important (3), strongly more important (5), very strongly more important (7), and extremely more important (9).…”
Section: Analytical Network Process (Anp) and Analytical Hierarchy Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they even argue that one expert can be sufficient if the expert has both knowledge and practical experience about the selection criteria. Furthermore, Erol et al (2022) also underline the experiences of the experts as more important than the number of experts. There are several studies obtained the findings from comparison matrices with a limited number of experts such as three professionals (Dikmen et al, 2010), three experts (Yu et al, 2010), four decision-makers (Ennaceur et al, 2017), five experts (Kil et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sustainability Risks In Mcpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they even argue that one expert can be sufficient if the expert has both knowledge and practical experience about the selection criteria. Furthermore, Erol et al. (2022) also underline the experiences of the experts as more important than the number of experts.…”
Section: Development Of Ramscommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al employed the AHP and fussy mathematics methods to evaluate the risk level of coal mines [50]. Erol et al developed a risk assessment process for mega construction projects with an ANP model [51]. Su et al comprehensively applied the ANP and probabilistic neural network methods to assess the risk of county mining areas [52].…”
Section: Mcdm and Its Application In Risk Management And Green Productmentioning
confidence: 99%