2019
DOI: 10.3390/electronics8040404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytical Cost-Optimal Cloudlet Placement Framework over Fiber-Wireless Networks with Quasi-Convex Latency Constraint

Abstract: To meet the low-latency constraints arising from future smart mobile devices, Internet-of-Things, and 5G applications, major interest is currently given to the integration of centralized cloud computing and distributed edge computing infrastructures to deliver higher performance and reliability to edge devices in accessing mobile cloud services. The three-tier network architecture arising from cloud, cloudlet, and edge-devices can handle miscellaneous latency requirements for both latency-sensitive and latency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aspect of fog network planning has also been approached in different angles in the literature but with similar related objectives at the end which mostly are minimizing delay, cost, bandwidth and overall energy consumption [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Some scholars have addressed the problem of fog network planning from the purely communication point of view by considering the network topologies and protocols to find minimize the number of cluster head nodes [16,[23][24][25]. Most of these research works were evaluated based on performance metrics functional metrics and non-functional metrics listed in [26].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aspect of fog network planning has also been approached in different angles in the literature but with similar related objectives at the end which mostly are minimizing delay, cost, bandwidth and overall energy consumption [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Some scholars have addressed the problem of fog network planning from the purely communication point of view by considering the network topologies and protocols to find minimize the number of cluster head nodes [16,[23][24][25]. Most of these research works were evaluated based on performance metrics functional metrics and non-functional metrics listed in [26].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more general cases, [15,16] studied the placement of heterogeneous cloudlets with different amounts of computation resources. Mondal et al [17] aimed to minimize the cloudlet installation cost by carefully planning cloudlet placement. However, the network is assumed to be static without considering users' movement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, constraint (16) indicates that if there is a cloudlet co-located with AP a i , there must be at least one server at AP a i . Constraint (17) implies that if requests via AP a j are handled at AP a i , there must be a cloudlet co-located with AP a i .…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave photonic link (MPL), microwave transmission over an optical fiber, or radio over fiber (RoF) are considered as good solutions for high speed wireless transmission [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] due to its low cost, its simple system architecture, its anti-interference, its large bandwidth, its low transmission loss, and its low power consumption. With the increase of new optical communication system [11][12][13][14] services, the ultra-high speed and high spectrum efficiency have become primary demands for improving microwave photonic transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%