2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2de
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytical Diffusion–Expansion Model for Forbush Decreases Caused by Flux Ropes

Abstract: We present an analytical diffusion-expansion Forbush decrease (FD) model ForbMod which is based on the widely used approach of the initially empty, closed magnetic structure (i.e. flux rope) which fills up slowly with particles by perpendicular diffusion. The model is restricted to explain only the depression caused by the magnetic structure of the interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). We use remote CME observations and a 3D reconstruction method (the Graduated Cylindrical Shell method) to constrain ini… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…force-free flux tube fitting results are inconclusive due to the low magnetic field strength in the magnetic ejecta), we assume that the observational path is a reasonable estimate of the FR radius but we also have to consider that the uncertainties are large. Using a power-law equation for the increase of FR size with heliospheric distance given by Dumbović et al (2018) adapted from a more general expression by Démoulin et al (2008) and constrained by the derived GCS and in situ results we estimate the power-law index n A , i.e. the expansion factor to n A = 0.51 −0.13 +0.14 .…”
Section: Flux Rope Evolution Using Gcs Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…force-free flux tube fitting results are inconclusive due to the low magnetic field strength in the magnetic ejecta), we assume that the observational path is a reasonable estimate of the FR radius but we also have to consider that the uncertainties are large. Using a power-law equation for the increase of FR size with heliospheric distance given by Dumbović et al (2018) adapted from a more general expression by Démoulin et al (2008) and constrained by the derived GCS and in situ results we estimate the power-law index n A , i.e. the expansion factor to n A = 0.51 −0.13 +0.14 .…”
Section: Flux Rope Evolution Using Gcs Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find to be 1.5, which represents a very fast expanding CME as for nonperturbed MCs, typical ≈ 0.8 (Gulisano et al, 2010) with the typical spread being ±0.19 (Démoulin, 2010). According to them, the magnetic field in the ejecta falloff as ∼ r (see also Dumbović et al, 2018) where ≈ −2 . According to them, the magnetic field in the ejecta falloff as ∼ r (see also Dumbović et al, 2018) where ≈ −2 .…”
Section: Expansion Speed and Expansion Of The Magnetic Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum magnetic field strength in the sheath falls off as ∼ r H (see Dumbović et al, 2018 for a discussion of logarithmic decrease of magnetic field and increase in size of CMEs and their relation) where is −1.7 ± 0.21. In the case of the ejecta, the maximum magnetic field strength falls off as ∼ r H where is −1.91±0.25, which is in reasonable agreement with previous theoretical considerations (Démoulin & Dasso, 2009) and empirical fits (Farrugia et al, 2005;Leitner et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2005;Winslow et al, 2015).…”
Section: Magnetic Field Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CME expansion has been investigated using theoretical and statistical studies by Schwenn (1998), Liu et al (2005), Démoulin andDasso (2009), Gulisano et al (2010), and for specific examples following the pioneer work of Farrugia et al (1993). Recently, Dumbović et al (2018) discussed the relation between heliospheric and in situ expansion as well as expansion in the size and magnetic field strength of the ME. Recently, Dumbović et al (2018) discussed the relation between heliospheric and in situ expansion as well as expansion in the size and magnetic field strength of the ME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%