1993
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(93)90140-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical expression for sheet carrier concentration vs gate voltage for HEMT modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the room temperature, E p (V GS1 ,V GS2 ) is the p th energy level and E F is the Fermi level [12].…”
Section: Carrier Density In the Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the room temperature, E p (V GS1 ,V GS2 ) is the p th energy level and E F is the Fermi level [12].…”
Section: Carrier Density In the Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, in 1993, DasGupta [29] proposed a good non-linear approximation which can be expressed by:…”
Section: Relation Between Fermi Level and Surface Charge Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the Model Description section, subsection 1 presented that Gupta's model for 2DEG versus Fermi level is the best except our model. Hence, we will make a comparison between our charge control model and DasGupta's [29]. Both of them are based the expression of Fermi level versus 2DEG themselves.…”
Section: Analysis Of Surface Charge Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the permittivity of active layer, q is electronic charge, The variation of E F with n s can be modeled very accurately by using a simple polynomial [10]:…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%