2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-004-0188-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical method for the performance evaluation of echelon kanban control systems

Abstract: We develop a general purpose analytical approximation method for the performance evaluation of a multi-stage, serial, echelon kanban control system. The basic principle of the method is to decompose the original system into a set of nested subsystems, each subsystem being associated with a particular echelon of stages. Each subsystem is analyzed in isolation using a product-form approximation technique. An iterative procedure is used to determine the unknown parameters of each subsystem. Numerical results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When there are large changes in demand, the Kanban system cannot respond quickly and smoothly. Much research has studied the behaviour and performance of the Kanban system in recent years (see Di Mascolo (1996), Krieg and Kuhn (2004), Koukoumialos and Liberopoulos (2005), Shahabudeen and Sivakumar (2007)), but there are few methods presented on cards adjusting in the Kanban system. Takahashi and Nakamura's system (1999) is developed for unstable changes in demand.…”
Section: Kanbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there are large changes in demand, the Kanban system cannot respond quickly and smoothly. Much research has studied the behaviour and performance of the Kanban system in recent years (see Di Mascolo (1996), Krieg and Kuhn (2004), Koukoumialos and Liberopoulos (2005), Shahabudeen and Sivakumar (2007)), but there are few methods presented on cards adjusting in the Kanban system. Takahashi and Nakamura's system (1999) is developed for unstable changes in demand.…”
Section: Kanbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the variability presented in the Ecuadorian SMEs context can influence negatively in the performance of Kanban systems. It is based in results like the presented by Koukoumialos and Liberopoulos [47] that show how a processing times with CV 2 beyond 1 reduce significantly the production capacity of a Kanban system. Similarly, the inter arrival time [26] and the volume demand variability presented in the Ecuadorian SMEs company can destroy the flow and undermine the performance of this kind of systems [48].…”
Section: Set-up Correlation: Sequenceindependent Set-up Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several other applications of CQN modeling and analysis to manufacturing, and in particular kanban and other pull control mechanisms (e.g., Di Mascolo et al 1996;Baynat et al 2001;Satyam and Krishnamurthi 2008), as well as production lines with finite buffers (e.g., Lagershausen et al 2013). In one of these applications, Koukoumialos and Liberopoulos (2005) develop an analytical approximation method for the performance evaluation of a multi-stage production inventory system operated under an echelon kanban (EK) policy. The connection between the EK policy and the EB policy becomes evident once the association between the number of available echelon kanbans in EK and the number of available buffer spaces in EB is made.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%