2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical method for the measurement of energy system sustainability in urban areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight coefficient vector was determined from the set of weights because the process of uncertainty randomisation was performed [31]. The quality assessment of the examined energy options by the GIS depends on giving priority to a certain weight (for the different cases and constraints) [28]. The cases were selected, compared and modelled according to the demands and needs of end users (Public Utility Company in this case).…”
Section: Normalised Values Of Ecology Sub-indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight coefficient vector was determined from the set of weights because the process of uncertainty randomisation was performed [31]. The quality assessment of the examined energy options by the GIS depends on giving priority to a certain weight (for the different cases and constraints) [28]. The cases were selected, compared and modelled according to the demands and needs of end users (Public Utility Company in this case).…”
Section: Normalised Values Of Ecology Sub-indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second bottom up energy demand model tested on Croatia as a case study was MAED-D. Here the model was less user friendly and required detailed and specific input data which could be difficult to obtain [22,23]. Additional disadvantage of MAED-D was its inability to modify model structure which could be very interesting and useful in some cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban infrastructure sustainability has transformed from above traditional three dimensions to the following four dimensions: demand dimension [71], status dimension [72,73], in uence dimension [74,75], and resource dimension [76][77][78]. Urban infrastructure resilience is mainly assessed from measure dimension, which re ects that urban infrastructure can quickly recover to normal status by technical, economic, and management measures after the occurrence of unexpected situations [8,35,79].…”
Section: Combination Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e assessment indexes of resource dimension, which were developed based on previous research on resource efficiency of urban infrastructure, include three main categories, that is, material, energy, and water. In the construction phase, sustainable infrastructure should efficiently use all materials to reduce the "embodied energy," which is consumed in the process of material production and transportation [76]. In the operation phase, sustainable infrastructure should minimize the overall energy consumption and consider the efficient use of multiple energy sources [77].…”
Section: Index Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%