1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01635034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical migration method for crustal wide angle reflections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this conversion an average velocity model was determined for the entire region based on the analysis of mutual shot point data for reflection traveltimes (Kaila & Krishna 1979). This model was translated to a 1-D interval velocity model to convert the reflection traveltime data to depth and migrated using the approach of Kaila et al (1982). The weak points of this approach were the conversion of average velocity to an interval velocity model, the assumption that this model holds good for the entire region of investigation and the inability to generate synthetic seismograms and compare the same with the observed seismograms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this conversion an average velocity model was determined for the entire region based on the analysis of mutual shot point data for reflection traveltimes (Kaila & Krishna 1979). This model was translated to a 1-D interval velocity model to convert the reflection traveltime data to depth and migrated using the approach of Kaila et al (1982). The weak points of this approach were the conversion of average velocity to an interval velocity model, the assumption that this model holds good for the entire region of investigation and the inability to generate synthetic seismograms and compare the same with the observed seismograms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crustal depth section ( Fig. la) has been prepared by the use of wide angle reflection data from shot points 0, 40, 80, 120 and 235 which were recorded for long distances using the migration method of Kaila, Roy Chowdhury & Krishna (1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%