2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model for crack spacing of thick reinforced concrete plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the average crack spacing of overlaystrengthened beams plays an important role in transferred shear stress along overlay-substrate interface and normal stress generated in the substrate concrete in case when the premature debonding failure is investigated (Zhang et al 2010;Wang and Ling 1998;Raoof and Hassanen 2000). It is, therefore, necessary to predict the cracking behavior of overlay-strengthened RC beam.Despite the fact that many design models have been provided by different structural codes or individual researchers with respect to average crack spacing of RC members with single or multilayered-reinforcement (JSCE 2007; EC2 2004; CSA 2004; NS 1992; CEB-FIP 1990;Broms 1965;Albandar and Mills 1974;Bặzant and Oh 1983;Rizk and Marzouk 2010;Dawood and Marzouk 2010;Marzouk et al 2010;Rizkalla et al 1983;Rizkalla and Hwang 1984), which are similar to overlay-strengthened RC member with reinforcement layers in the substrate and overlay, their applicability for overlay-strengthened beams has not yet been investigated.The main objective of this study is to develop a rational methodology for predicting the average crack spacing of overlay-strengthened RC beam. Firstly, the predicted average crack spacing based on existing models from several design specifications is compared with that from experimental database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the average crack spacing of overlaystrengthened beams plays an important role in transferred shear stress along overlay-substrate interface and normal stress generated in the substrate concrete in case when the premature debonding failure is investigated (Zhang et al 2010;Wang and Ling 1998;Raoof and Hassanen 2000). It is, therefore, necessary to predict the cracking behavior of overlay-strengthened RC beam.Despite the fact that many design models have been provided by different structural codes or individual researchers with respect to average crack spacing of RC members with single or multilayered-reinforcement (JSCE 2007; EC2 2004; CSA 2004; NS 1992; CEB-FIP 1990;Broms 1965;Albandar and Mills 1974;Bặzant and Oh 1983;Rizk and Marzouk 2010;Dawood and Marzouk 2010;Marzouk et al 2010;Rizkalla et al 1983;Rizkalla and Hwang 1984), which are similar to overlay-strengthened RC member with reinforcement layers in the substrate and overlay, their applicability for overlay-strengthened beams has not yet been investigated.The main objective of this study is to develop a rational methodology for predicting the average crack spacing of overlay-strengthened RC beam. Firstly, the predicted average crack spacing based on existing models from several design specifications is compared with that from experimental database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of their tests was on the crack pattern and the mean stress/strain response of the tested panels. Similar tests were performed by Dawood and Marzouk (2010). The focus in their tests was on the crack spacing and the crack width.…”
Section: Two-way Crackingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A crack spacing model was developed for thick axially loaded plates (Dawood and Marzouk 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, which considered the equilibrium and compatibility equations of reinforced concrete elements. The analytical model for maximum crack spacing was expressed as follows:…”
Section: Crack Width Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good estimate of the maximum crack spacing was obtained by Dawood and Marzouk (2010a, 2010b, 2010c, where the influence of the main parameters affecting the cracking behavior of reinforced concrete structures, such as the concrete cover, longitudinal bar diameter f 1 , and spacing S b are taken into consideration. Figure 11a shows the effective concrete area surrounding the reinforcement in case of (h t ≤ 4C).…”
Section: ½17mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation