“…Processes that cause damage zone growth include fault and process zone propagation and linkage [e.g., Cowie and Scholz, 1992;McGrath and Davison, 1995;Vermilye and Scholz, 1998], wear related to fault geometry [e.g., Scholz, 1987;Wilson et al, 2003], and off-fault plasticity accompanying earthquake rupture [e.g., Rice et al, 2005; J. P. Ampuero and X. Mao, Upper limit on damage zone thickness controlled by seismogenic depth, in Fault Zone Dynamic Processes: Evolution of Fault Properties During Seismic Rupture, AGU Monogr., edited by M. Y. Thomas, H. S. Bhat, and T. Mitchell, manuscripts in preparation, 2016]. Fracture modes and attitudes in the damage zone are a function of the stress field when they form, suggesting that fracture characteristics can be useful for constraining off-fault stresses [e.g., Kilsdonk and Fletcher, 1989;Saucier et al, 1992;Chester and Fletcher, 1997;Chester and Chester, 2000;Di Toro et al, 2005;Griffith et al, 2010]. Based on this relation, the types, distributions, and orientations of damage zone structures corresponding to each fault evolution process have been recognized in some cases, including mature faults that have experienced many slip events [e.g., Vermilye and Scholz, 1998;Wilson et al, 2003;Mitchell and Faulkner, 2009].…”