2020
DOI: 10.2478/acph-2021-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical “quality by design” approach in RP-HPLC method development and validation for reliable and rapid estimation of irinotecan in an injectable formulation

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to develop a robust, simple, economical and sensitive HPLC-UV method using the “quality-by-design” approach for the estimation of irinotecan (IRI) in marketed formulations. RP-HPLC method was developed by applying Box-Behnken design with Hyper-Clone (Phenomenex®) C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm id, particle size 5 µm, ODS 130 Å) as a stationary phase. Acetonitrile and 20 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) containing 0.1 % triethylamine in a ratio of 45:55 % (V/V) was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For estimating the limits of detection and quantification, the method reported by Bhaskaran et al [ 46 ] was used based on equations: LOD = 3.3 σ/s and LOQ = 10 σ/s, where, σ is SD of y-intercepts of the regression line and s is the slope of the calibration line. LODs were reported to be 0.075 and 0.134, while LOQs were calculated to be 0.248 and 0.448 µg/mL for both XIP and VAL, respectively (Table 7 ) showing that the proposed method is highly sensitive and being applicable for future bioequivalence studies where it is mandatory to detect small drug concentrations in plasma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For estimating the limits of detection and quantification, the method reported by Bhaskaran et al [ 46 ] was used based on equations: LOD = 3.3 σ/s and LOQ = 10 σ/s, where, σ is SD of y-intercepts of the regression line and s is the slope of the calibration line. LODs were reported to be 0.075 and 0.134, while LOQs were calculated to be 0.248 and 0.448 µg/mL for both XIP and VAL, respectively (Table 7 ) showing that the proposed method is highly sensitive and being applicable for future bioequivalence studies where it is mandatory to detect small drug concentrations in plasma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration at which the signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1 is produced is termed as LOD, whereas the concentration at which the signal-to-noise ratio of 10:1 is produced with less than 10% RSD ( n = 3) is termed as LOQ. The following formula was used for examining the LOD and LOQ for both the analytes: LOD = 3 . / s LOQ = 10 0.25em σ / s where σ stands for the standard deviation of y -intercepts of the regression line, and s stands for the slope obtained from the calibration curve. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where 'SD a ' is the standard deviation of the y-intercept and 'm' is the slope of the calibration curve. 15,16…”
Section: Lod and Loqmentioning
confidence: 99%