1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb00451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Anatomic Source of False Venous Reflux with Continuous Wave Doppler

Abstract: A bidirectional Doppler signal in a region of venous junction without any incompetent veins can be misinterpreted as venous reflux. A careful examination of veins not only at the region of the junction, but also at some distance down the stem of the vein is important during CW Doppler or duplex assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its localization power is also poor 10 as it can easily misinterpret other closely related venous signals. [9][10][11] Duplex ultrasound has become the method of choice for the assessment of venous disease. It is safe, non-invasive, reliable and cost-effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its localization power is also poor 10 as it can easily misinterpret other closely related venous signals. [9][10][11] Duplex ultrasound has become the method of choice for the assessment of venous disease. It is safe, non-invasive, reliable and cost-effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[8][9][10] It may indicate reflux in the popliteal, gastrocnemius or Giacomini veins, which may even be a result of, clinically insignificant, segmental reflux. A bidirectional Doppler signal in the region of a venous junction without any incompetence can also be misinterpreted as venous reflux 11 and other unspecified superficial veins can be the source of reflux signals. 12 Consequently, some authors have recommended assessment with duplex ultrasound in all patients with uncomplicated primary varicose veins if surgery is contemplated.…”
Section: Assessment Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%