2022
DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An anatomically correct 3D‐printed mouse phantom for magnetic particle imaging studies

Abstract: We report anatomically correct 3D‐printed mouse phantoms that can be used to plan experiments and evaluate analysis protocols for magnetic particle imaging (MPI) studies. The 3D‐printed phantoms were based on the Digimouse 3D whole body mouse atlas and incorporate cavities representative of a liver, brain tumor, and orthotopic breast cancer tumor placed in anatomically correct locations, allowing evaluation of the effect of precise doses of MPI tracer. To illustrate their use, a constant tracer iron mass was p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D Printed Mouse Phantom for MPI To aid in the optimization of future MPI studies, Sarna et al [47] engineered an anatomically relevant mouse phantom with several hollow organ-representative cavities generated from the Digimouse atlas. The brain cavity contained a tumor simulacron, as well as two capillary tubes used for SPION delivery.…”
Section: Magnetic Particle Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D Printed Mouse Phantom for MPI To aid in the optimization of future MPI studies, Sarna et al [47] engineered an anatomically relevant mouse phantom with several hollow organ-representative cavities generated from the Digimouse atlas. The brain cavity contained a tumor simulacron, as well as two capillary tubes used for SPION delivery.…”
Section: Magnetic Particle Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that these fiducials are imaged using the same parameters, including selection field gradient strength and excitation amplitude and frequency, as these factors contribute to MPI signal strength. These fiducials may be included with the subject within the imaging field of view (FOV) [20][21][22][23], which we refer to as "internal calibration". The added benefit of internal fiducials is they can serve as benchmarks for co-registration with other imaging modalities (e.g., optical images acquired prior to a scan, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%