Language and Poverty 1970
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-754850-0.50025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Annotated Bibliography of Journal Articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 131 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most persistent theme that runs throughout the poverty literature, particularly from the 1960s and early 1970s, is that the language skills of lower-class (particularly African American) children are deficient in significant areas. For example, disadvantaged children have less access to and proficiency with formal, elaborated language (e.g., vocabulary, syntactic structure); are more prone to use nonstandard English; are more deficient in auditory discrimination skills; and are less able to understand word meanings (see reviews by Williams, 1970;Williams & Naremore, 1970). Although many deficiencies have been identified from this research, some researchers have argued that a large portion of the language characteristics of lower-class children could be more appropriately interpreted as different but not deficient (Baratz, 1970;Labov, 1970).…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most persistent theme that runs throughout the poverty literature, particularly from the 1960s and early 1970s, is that the language skills of lower-class (particularly African American) children are deficient in significant areas. For example, disadvantaged children have less access to and proficiency with formal, elaborated language (e.g., vocabulary, syntactic structure); are more prone to use nonstandard English; are more deficient in auditory discrimination skills; and are less able to understand word meanings (see reviews by Williams, 1970;Williams & Naremore, 1970). Although many deficiencies have been identified from this research, some researchers have argued that a large portion of the language characteristics of lower-class children could be more appropriately interpreted as different but not deficient (Baratz, 1970;Labov, 1970).…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%