2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-012-0396-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An answer to a question on the convolution of functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implication (i)⇒(ii) is trivial. Implication (ii)⇒(iii) follows from the Young inequality (note that 1/p + 1/q ≤ 2), and implication (iii)⇒(i) follows immediately from [5], Theorem 2.4 (in the same way as this implication in the proof of Theorem 18.41).…”
Section: Dichotomies For Convolution In L P Spacesmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Implication (i)⇒(ii) is trivial. Implication (ii)⇒(iii) follows from the Young inequality (note that 1/p + 1/q ≤ 2), and implication (iii)⇒(i) follows immediately from [5], Theorem 2.4 (in the same way as this implication in the proof of Theorem 18.41).…”
Section: Dichotomies For Convolution In L P Spacesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The main result of the paper [5] of Akbarbaglu and Maghsoudi implies the following result which together with Theorem 18.41 show that the assumptions on p and q in the Minkowski inequality cannot be relaxed.…”
Section: Dichotomies For Convolution In L P Spacesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Głąb and Strobin [4], using the notion of porosity, generalised and considerably extended some interesting results on the convolution of functions essentially due to Rickert [7] andŻelazko [10]. See also [1,3,8] for some related results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%