2004
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Anteroposterior Axis of the Tibia for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
323
4
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
323
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the SEA is a functional flexion-extension axis and considered an anatomic basis of the coronal plane of the knee reference [8,9,14,20,29], although the reliability of the SEA measurement has not been proven [3,5]. We believe the AP axis of the tibia described by Akagi et al [1] is the appropriate rotational reference of the tibia. Theoretically, there is no rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components in extension when surgeons use the AP axis as the rotational reference of the tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the SEA is a functional flexion-extension axis and considered an anatomic basis of the coronal plane of the knee reference [8,9,14,20,29], although the reliability of the SEA measurement has not been proven [3,5]. We believe the AP axis of the tibia described by Akagi et al [1] is the appropriate rotational reference of the tibia. Theoretically, there is no rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components in extension when surgeons use the AP axis as the rotational reference of the tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given all the requirements for the tibial rotational reference in UKA, we suspected the AP axis of the tibia, described by Akagi et al [1], can be used as a tibial rotational reference. The AP axis connecting the middle of the PCL to the medial border of the patellar tendon attachment is a reproducible and reliable line because it is perpendicular to the SEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, various sagittal planes have been described including a line perpendicular to the posterior joint surface passing through the medial third of the tibial tubercle 7 and a line passing through the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament perpendicularly to the projected femoral transepicondylar axis (Akagi's line). 8 Unfortunately, many of these references vary among patients are difficult to establish and are, therefore, unreliable. The ROM technique aligns the tibial component according to the rotational alignment of the femoral component during trial…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach, which avoids reference to anatomical landmarks, is the range-of-movement (ROM) technique, in which the knee is put through a full range of flexion and extension, allowing the trial tibial implant to orient itself in the best position relative to the femoral component [11]. The anatomical landmark technique has been reported to be reliable and reproducible by some authors [12,13] but not by others [1]. The ROM technique has been reported to be inappropriate for alignment of the tibial component as it leaves the component more internally rotated [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%