1996
DOI: 10.1080/09663699650021873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Anti-geopolitical Eye: Maggie O'Kane in Bosnia, 1992-93

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(Paglia, 1994, p. xi) In this section we draw on the dynamic duo of Apollo and Dionysus to explore Google Earth's alluring and oftentimes bizarre images, seductive interface, incitement of feverous online discussions, and intertwining of the political and the poetic. 4 To do this, we focus on the following: first, the claim that Google Earth is a collectively used 'digital peep-box'; second, the idea that Google Earth's grip on users lies not so much in its ability but rather its failure to clearly reveal a visible and legible world; and third, by considering Google Earth as exemplary of what Gearóid Ó Tuathail (1996) calls an 'anti-geopolitical eye', we argue Google Earth challenges our usual (that is, Foucauldian) understandings of panoptic power. Finally, we discuss the ways in which Google Earth can be understood as an enigmatic and aesthetic artifact that prompts us to consider a ''significant disjunction between the politics and ethics of cultural study" (Dean, 2002, p. 31).…”
Section: Surfing Under the Influence Of Google Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Paglia, 1994, p. xi) In this section we draw on the dynamic duo of Apollo and Dionysus to explore Google Earth's alluring and oftentimes bizarre images, seductive interface, incitement of feverous online discussions, and intertwining of the political and the poetic. 4 To do this, we focus on the following: first, the claim that Google Earth is a collectively used 'digital peep-box'; second, the idea that Google Earth's grip on users lies not so much in its ability but rather its failure to clearly reveal a visible and legible world; and third, by considering Google Earth as exemplary of what Gearóid Ó Tuathail (1996) calls an 'anti-geopolitical eye', we argue Google Earth challenges our usual (that is, Foucauldian) understandings of panoptic power. Finally, we discuss the ways in which Google Earth can be understood as an enigmatic and aesthetic artifact that prompts us to consider a ''significant disjunction between the politics and ethics of cultural study" (Dean, 2002, p. 31).…”
Section: Surfing Under the Influence Of Google Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even mainstream media, however, can also help to disrupt and challenge 'Western geopolitical scripts', thereby contributing to 'antigeopolitics' or 'counter-geopolitics' narratives, as in the case of some media coverage of wars in Bosnia. 28 The above research shows that geopolitical framings can structure, as well as be challenged by, media scripts. In turn, the media scripts can (re)produce and circulate geopolitical understandings as well as unsettle them.…”
Section: Critical Geopolitics and Media Framingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The near-impossibility of travel to FATA by journalists and researchers outside or inside of Pakistan means that these reports give a rare glimpse of life on the ground. These shared stories of the women, children, and men of FATA "disturbs and disrupts the hegemonic foreign policy gaze" 64 , and refocuses the lens of the White House's geographical imagination. Drone warfare in Pakistan, just like the "war on terror" more generally, is not a universal experience 65 : it is differentially distributed and violently uneven, split between suburban pilots that sit in air-conditioned trailers and scan video screens, adjusting their "soda straw" digital view of the world with a joystick, and the everyday experiences told by the people of FATA.…”
Section: The Double Tapmentioning
confidence: 99%