DCs represent the major cell type leading to polarized T-helper (Th) cell responses in vivo. Here, we asked whether the instruction of murine Th2 responses by DCs matured with the proinflammatory cytokine TNF is qualitatively different from maturation by different types of TLR4/MyD88-dependent variant-specific surface glycoproteins (VSGs) of Trypanosoma brucei (T. brucei). The results obtained by analyzing DC surface markers, Notch ligand mRNA, cytokines, asthma, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models as well as performing microarrays indicate that both types of stimuli induce similar inflammatory, semi-mature DC profiles. DCs matured by TNF or VSG treatment expressed a common inflammatory signature of 24 genes correlating with their Th2-polarization capacity. However, the same 24 genes and 4498 additional genes were expressed by DCs treated with LPS that went on to induce Th1 cells. These findings support the concept of a default pathway for Th2-cell induction in DCs matured under suboptimal or inflammatory conditions, independent of the surface receptors and signaling pathways involved. Our data also indicate that quantitative differences in DC maturation might direct Th2-vs Th1-cell responses, since suboptimally matured inflammatory DCs induce default Th2-cell maturation, whereas fully mature DCs induce Th1-cell maturation.Key words: DCs . microarray . Th2 cells . TNF . Trypanosoma
Supporting Information available online
IntroductionDCs play a fundamental role in the induction of adaptive immune responses as well as in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance [1][2][3]. Through the expression of pattern-recognition receptors (PPRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), DCs are able to sense a wide array of pathogens and mount an appropriate T-helper (Th) cell response [4]. Naïve CD4 1 T-cell precursors can differentiate into a variety of Th-cell lineages characterized by the cytokines produced: Th1 cells secrete predominately IFN-g, Th2 cells release IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and Th17 cells typically produce . Although the contribution of DCs for CD4 1 Th-cell polarization is under debate [6], several DC-derived mechanisms have been described to significantly direct Th-cell phenotypes.
3479DCs change their maturation status by upregulating surface expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules and by producing a defined set of cytokines to optimally induce distinct Th-cell responses [7][8][9]. Due to their immunostimulatory function, DCs are of particular interest in immunotherapy settings, such as cancer therapy and infectious disease intervention [10,11]. Thus, the Th-cell polarizing profile defined by the maturation signature of DCs is of vital interest. Several membrane markers on DCs and soluble factors secreted by DCs have been described to polarize toward Th2 responses. These include costimulatory molecules such as OX40 [12], , the Notch family member Jagged-2 [14], the cytokine IL-6 [15], or arachidonic acid metabolites such as PGE 2 [16][17][18]. Much less is known about the fac...