An appeal for a code of conduct for marine conservation

Abstract

A B S T R A C TMarine conservation actions are promoted to conserve natural values and support human wellbeing. Yet the quality of governance processes and the social consequences of some marine conservation initiatives have been the subject of critique and even human rights complaints. These types of governance and social issues may jeopardize the legitimacy of, support for and long-term effectiveness of marine conservation. Thus, we argue that a clearly articulated and comprehensive set of social standards -a code of conduct -is needed to guide marine conservation. In this paper, we draw on the results of an expert meeting and scoping review to present key principles that might be taken into account in a code of conduct, to propose a draft set of foundational elements for inclusion in a code of conduct, to discuss the benefits and challenges of such a document, and to propose next steps to develop and facilitate the uptake of a broadly applicable code of conduct within the marine conservation community. The objectives of developing such a code of conduct are to promote fair conservation governance and decision-making, socially just conservation actions and outcomes, and accountable conservation practihttp://dx

Delivering on seafood traceability under the new U.S. import monitoring program

“…Moreover, widespread trade bans and restricted markets have the potential to further incentivize illegal operations as vessels scramble to make profits while market access close, exacerbating illegal working conditions where migrants are sold into slavery on fishing vessels (Mendoza et al 2016). Thus, achieving traceability seafood while also improving conditions for fishers in developing nations cannot be improved solely through more stringent regulations, but must consider solutions that equitably consider the rights and needs of local stakeholders (see Bennett et al 2017). Working to ensure sustainable livelihoods will require careful consideration of the unique governance and socio-economic context of each fishery and/or nation that US agencies work with (Challender et al 2015).…”

Stakeholder perspectives on large-scale marine protected areas

“…A central concern of participants at a 'think tank' on the human dimensions of LSMPAs was the violation of rights and perpetuation of social injustice through marine conservation [44], leading to a call for a 'code of conduct' for marine conservation [58]. Respecting stakeholders' views and Indigenous rights and incorporating their viewpoints meaningfully into LSMPA governance is essential for effective and equitable conservation.…”

Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis

“…This facilitates the sharing of power, democratically debated decisions, maintenance of dignity, and the creation of representative plans and actions. Power-and benefit-sharing mechanisms can help ensure that the socioeconomic benefits and burdens of conservation and environmental management are distributed in a fair manner, and that rights and responsibilities are shared and assigned commensurate to circumstances (Bennett, Teh et al, 2017;Pascual et al, 2014;Zafra-Calvo et al, 2017). Finally, equitable governance is safeguarded when laws and policies are present to protect local rights and tenure, ensure that consent is freely given, and groups have access to justice to defend against incursions F I G U R E 1 A practical framework for understanding the objectives, attributes, and elements of environmental governance or facilitate reparations and/or compensation for past wrongs (Bennett, Teh et al, 2017;FAO, 2012).…”