2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0733-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ‘apples to apples’ comparison of various tests for exponentiality

Abstract: The exponential distribution is a popular model both in practice and in theoretical work. As a result, a multitude of tests based on varied characterisations have been developed for testing the hypothesis that observed data are realised from this distribution. Many of the recently developed tests contain a tuning parameter, usually appearing in a weight function. In this paper we compare the powers of 20 tests for exponentiality-some containing a tuning parameter and some that do not. To ensure a fair 'apples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they proved the consistency of the test procedure against any fixed alternative distribution. The test has already been included in the extensive comparative simulation study conducted by Allison et al (2017). Adding a tuning parameter to the weight function leads to the test statistic proposed by Baringhaus and Henze (2008).…”
Section: Tests For the Gamma Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they proved the consistency of the test procedure against any fixed alternative distribution. The test has already been included in the extensive comparative simulation study conducted by Allison et al (2017). Adding a tuning parameter to the weight function leads to the test statistic proposed by Baringhaus and Henze (2008).…”
Section: Tests For the Gamma Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A test based on G (1) n or G (2) n rejects H 0 for large values of the statistic. A suggestion for the choice of the weight function and equivalent expressions for G (1) n and G (2) n that are suitable for computations can be found in section 6.…”
Section: The Proposed Test Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42]). Stating that X has a standard normal distribution if, and only if, E f ′ (X) − Xf (X) = 0 (2) holds for each absolutely continuous function f for which the expectation exists, it appears reasonable to regard the left hand side of (2), for a suitable function f , as an estimate of Eh(X) − Eh(N ) since both terms ought to be small whenever the distribution of X is close to standard normal. In practice, solving the differential equation…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting test is consistent against general alternatives (cf. [6]) and has already been included in the extensive simulation study [3] delivering a remarkable performance in terms of the tests power. We also want to emphasize that our Theorem 1.2 is a vast generalization of the characterization (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%