An application driven comparison of depth perception on desktop 3D displays

Holliman, Nicolas S.; Froner, Barbara; Liversedge, Simon Paul

doi:10.1117/12.706275

Cited by 14 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a pilot session of this experiment we assessed an equivalent range of 3D displays but with bigger disparity intervals, namely 0-, 2-, 4-and 6-pixel disparity [14]. The results of the pilot study were in accordance with the results of this study but had a higher, even though acceptable, degree of noise.…”

Section: Prior Worksupporting

confidence: 85%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays

2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Prior Worksupporting

confidence: 85%

“…In a pilot run of this experiment, one of the displays, the Iris-3D, was showing significant depth at 0-pixel disparity [14]. This turned out to be due to an optical mis-alignment which was corrected prior to running the current trial; as a result the display then showed no significant depth at 0-pixel disparity as expected.…”

Section: -Pixel Disparitymentioning

confidence: 73%

A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays

2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For objective assessment of image quality, 2D image quality metrics are not appropriate and 3D quality metrics are not available yet [34]. In addition, the perceived quality of stereoscopic presentations depends on the 3D display (driver, electronics), varying with individual user physiology [8]. Even watching good quality 3DTV induced symptoms of simulator sickness in a pre-/post-comparison [22].…”

Section: Benefits and Disadvantages Of Stereoscopic Visionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding user experience in stereoscopic 3D games

Schild

LaViola

Masuch

2012

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent advances in digital game technology are making stereoscopic games more popular. Stereoscopic 3D graphics promise a better gaming experience but this potential has not yet been proven empirically. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study that evaluates player experience of three stereoscopic games in comparison with their monoscopic counterparts. We examined 60 participants, each playing one of the three games, using three selfreporting questionnaires and one psychophysiological instrument. Our main results are (1) stereoscopy in games increased experienced immersion, spatial presence, and simulator sickness; (2) the effects strongly differed across the three games and for both genders, indicating more affect on male users and with games involving depth animations; (3) results related to attention and cognitive involvement indicate more direct and less thoughtful interactions with stereoscopic games, pointing towards a more natural experience through stereoscopy.

show abstract

“…Recent progress on subjective and objective studies of 3D image quality assessment (IQA) is promising [1,2] but the understanding of 3D depth quality remains limited. In [3], it was reported that the perceived depth performance cannot always be predicted from displaying image geometry alone while other system factors, including software drivers, electronic interfaces, and individual participant differences may also play significant roles. In [4,5], it was suggested that depth perception may need to be considered independently from perceived 3D image quality.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Depth perception of distorted stereoscopic images

Wang

2015

2015 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to measure the perceptual quality of depth information in stereoscopic natural images, especially images undergoing different types of symmetric and asymmetric distortions, is a fundamentally important issue that is not well understood. In this paper, we present two of our recent subjective studies on depth quality. The first one follows the absolute category rating (ACR) protocol that is widely used in general image quality assessment research. We find that traditional approaches such as ACR is problematic in this scenario because monocular cues and the spatial quality of images have strong impacts on the depth quality scores given by subjects, making it difficult to single out the actual contributions of stereoscopic cues in depth perception. To overcome this problem, we carry out the second subjective study where depth effect is synthesized at different depth levels before various types and levels of symmetric and asymmetric distortions are applied. Instead of following the traditional approach, we ask subjects to identify and label depth polarizations, and a Depth Perception Difficulty Index (DPDI) is developed based on the percentage of correct and incorrect subject judgements. We find this approach highly effective at quantifying depth perception induced by stereo cues and observe a number of interesting effects regarding image content dependency, distortion type dependency, and the impacts of symmetric versus asymmetric distortions. We believe that these are useful steps towards building comprehensive 3D quality-of-experience models for stereoscopic images.Index Terms-depth perception, stereoscopic image, 3D image, image quality assessment, quality-of-experience, asymmetric distortion

show abstract

An application driven comparison of depth perception on desktop 3D displays

Cited by 14 publications

References 13 publications

A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays

A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays

Understanding user experience in stereoscopic 3D games

Depth perception of distorted stereoscopic images

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About