Let G be a p-adic reductive group. We determine the extensions between admissible smooth mod p representations of G parabolically induced from supersingular representations of Levi subgroups of G, in terms of extensions between representations of Levi subgroups of G and parabolic induction. This proves for the most part a conjecture formulated by the author in a previous article and gives some strong evidence for the remaining part. In order to do so, we use the derived functors of the left and right adjoints of the parabolic induction functor, both related to Emerton's δ-functor of derived ordinary parts. We compute the latter on parabolically induced representations of G by pushing to their limits the methods initiated and expanded by the author in previous articles. * This research was partly supported by EPSRC grant EP/L025302/1. arXiv:1607.02031v2 [math.RT] 25 May 2017Let J ⊆ ∆. We fix a totally decomposed 5 standard compact open subgroup N J,0 ⊆ N J and we define an open submonoid of L J by settingNote that Z J is generated by Z + J as a group and L J is generated by L + J and Z J as a monoid (cf. [Eme06, Proposition 3.3.2]). Moreover, any λ ∈ X * (S) associated to P J has its image contained in the maximal split subtorus S J of Z • J and satisfies α, λ > 0 for all α ∈ Φ + \Φ + J , thus the assumption of § 3.1 with N = N J and Z = S J is satisfied. We fix z ∈ Z + J strictly contracting N J,0 (equivalently Z J is generated by Z + J and z −1 as a monoid).We use the notation of § 2.3. The subgroup N J, I w ⊆ N J is stable under conjugation by B J,w J , and we have a semidirect product N J,Since N J, I w,0 is totally decomposed, we have a short exact sequence of topological groupsIn particular, N J, I w,0 is stable under the quotient action of B + J,w J on N J, I w . Lemma 3.2.1. For all n ∈ N, the inflation map is a natural B + J,w J -equivariant isomorphism H n N J, I w,0 , π N J, I w,0 I w ∼ −→ H n N J, I w,0 , πI w . Proof. The Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence associated to (20) is naturally a spectral sequence of B + J,w J -representations (cf. [Hau16b, (2.3)])Proof. We have a semidirect productLet n ∈ N J, I w,0 . Proceeding as in the proof of Lemma 2.3.1, we see that u n u −1 n −1 ∈ N J, I w so that u n u −1 = n n with n ∈ N J, I w . Thus bn b −1 = (b n b −1 )(b n b −1 ) ∈ N J, I w,0 , and since N J, I w,0 is totally decomposed, we deduce that b n b −1 ∈ N J, I w,0 .Lemma 3.2.4. For all n ∈ N, there is a natural such that the action of z on its kernel and cokernel is locally nilpotent.Proof. We use the notation of § 2.3. We let w J ∈ J∩ I w J −1 (I) W J and we put I w :and πI w be as in § 3.2. In the course of the proof of Proposition 3.3.2, we see that H n (N J,0 , πI w ) is locally Z + J -finite (as we saw it for H n (N J,0 , c-ind P − I I w J P J P − I σ) in the course of the proof of Proposition 3.3.1). Since σ is locally admissible, the L I∩ I w J (J) -representations H • Ord L I ∩P I∩ I w J (J) σ are locally admissible by [Eme10b, Theorem 3.4.7 (2)], thus locally Z I∩ I w J (J) -finite by ...