2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of subagging for the improvement of prediction accuracy of multivariate calibration models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is capable of calibrating mixtures with almost identical spectra without loss of prediction capacity using the spectrophotometric method. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of the validation step in GA wavelength selection for multiple linear regression in order to avoid random correlation and the selection of irrelevant variables [43,46,77,[79][80][81].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is capable of calibrating mixtures with almost identical spectra without loss of prediction capacity using the spectrophotometric method. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of the validation step in GA wavelength selection for multiple linear regression in order to avoid random correlation and the selection of irrelevant variables [43,46,77,[79][80][81].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better evaluate the advantage of bagging/subagging, a relative RMSEP reduction was also calculated as [37] ‫ۃ‬RMSEP ୧୬ୢ୧୴୧ୢ୳ୟ୪ ‫ۄ‬ − ‫ۃ‬RMSEP (ୱ୳)ୠୟ ୧୬ ‫ۄ‬…”
Section: Implemental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these modified methods, subagging was reported to provide similar performance to bagging with less computation, since it uses a subset of the data for model development [41]. For the purpose of multivariate spectroscopic calibration, subagging has already been applied to linear methods as PLS and MLR with variable selection [37]; yet its role in improving non-linear calibration methods (such as ANN and GPR) has been under-explored. Previous studies demonstrated that non-linear regression for spectroscopic calibration can achieve accurate prediction of analyte properties [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adaboost is adapted to combine weak classification or prediction models with strong independence, while Bagging is applicable to combine strong classification or prediction models. Some approaches, such as sub-Bagging [11] and weighted member models [12], were brought forward to improve ensemble learning with satisfactory results. This paper presents an improved Bagging algorithm for power transformer fault prediction based on oil-dissolved gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%