2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00039-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
278
1
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
278
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP could be implemented by four steps: structuring the decision problem, measurement and data collection, determination of normalized weights, and synthesis toward-finding solution to the problem [47]. Its formulas and detailed descriptions could be found in several studies [48,49].…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP could be implemented by four steps: structuring the decision problem, measurement and data collection, determination of normalized weights, and synthesis toward-finding solution to the problem [47]. Its formulas and detailed descriptions could be found in several studies [48,49].…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çünkü AHS uygulamalarında kararlara birden fazla kişinin katılması durumunda, bu kişilerin kararlarından tek bir hüküm çıkarılması gerekmektedir (Özden, 2008: 304). Bunun için en uygun yöntemin, katılımcıların vermiş oldukları cevapların geometrik ortalamalarının alınmasıdır (Tam ve Tummala, 2001). Geometrik ortalamanın en uygun yöntem olmasının sebebi ise, karşılaştırma matrisinde simetrik elemanların birbirinin tersi olması gerektiği kuralını sağlamasıdır (Ömürbek ve Tunca, 2013: 58 Bu faktörler Kozaklı'nın termal turizmde rakiplerine nazaran rekabet avantajı kazanmasında belirleyici faktörler olarak tespit edilmiştir.…”
Section: Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Bulgularıunclassified
“…With too many criteria, supplier selection becomes difficult and time-consuming. It may also lead to evaluator's assessment bias [54]. In this study, criteria cut-off is processed based on the level of importance of each criterion using the natural cut-off point method [64].…”
Section: Determining the Final Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%