1995
DOI: 10.4064/aa-72-3-229-234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the projections of $C^{∞}$ automorphic forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a special case of Corollary 1, we obtain Noda's identity in [14] which relates the Fourier coefficients of the holomorphic cusp form f and the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function or the zeros of the symmetric square Lfunction of f . In addition, Theorem 1 gives an analytic series expansion of the central value L(1/2, f × g).…”
Section: It Satisfies the (Trivial) Functional Equation C(s) = C(1 − S)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a special case of Corollary 1, we obtain Noda's identity in [14] which relates the Fourier coefficients of the holomorphic cusp form f and the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function or the zeros of the symmetric square Lfunction of f . In addition, Theorem 1 gives an analytic series expansion of the central value L(1/2, f × g).…”
Section: It Satisfies the (Trivial) Functional Equation C(s) = C(1 − S)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further (5.2) holds for all s ∈ C, since f is a cusp form. By Lemma 1 of [14], the product f (z)E(z, s) is a C ∞ -modular form of bounded growth for 0 < σ < 1. Hence, by (4.4), we have…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our region − k 2 + 2 < Re(s) < k 2 − 1 includes the critical strip of Rankin zeta-functions. This is an advantage because it makes it possible to evaluate the zeta-functions at non-trivial zeros (see [6,7]). The proof of [6,Lemma 1] in fact is insufficient to imply the assertion, however the insufficiency is corrected essentially in the author's subsequent paper [7].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%