1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0763(199609)3:3<141::aid-arp53>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the self-potential (SP) method in archaeogeophysical prospection

Abstract: Usage of the self‐potential (SP) method on archaeological sites has been very limited and the phenomena that form the SP anomalies are not very well known. We believe that the vertical capillary water flows around stone walls that can be encountered frequently in archaeological sites, the porosity of the soil surrounding the archaeological structures, the moisture and clay ratio of the soil, and the changes in pH value of the soil, may form the SP anomalies. Moreover, an SP anomaly also may be formed if there … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-potential anomalies are caused by differences in temperature, electrical resistivity or moisture content, as well as fluid flow in response to pressure gradients. Variations in physical properties are the main causes of ion accumulations along geologic and domain discontinuities (Schiavone and Quarto, 1984;Ercan et al, 1986;Corwin, 1990;Drahor et al, 1996;Drahor, 2004). In many cases the SP data have been interpreted qualitatively, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-potential anomalies are caused by differences in temperature, electrical resistivity or moisture content, as well as fluid flow in response to pressure gradients. Variations in physical properties are the main causes of ion accumulations along geologic and domain discontinuities (Schiavone and Quarto, 1984;Ercan et al, 1986;Corwin, 1990;Drahor et al, 1996;Drahor, 2004). In many cases the SP data have been interpreted qualitatively, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP measurements are not frequently applied for searching and localization of archaeological targets (e.g., Wynn and Sherwood, 1984;Mauriello et al, 1998;Eppelbaum et al, 2003a, b;Drahor, 2004;Drahor et al, 2006;Di Maio et al, 2010;Shevnin et al, 2014;Tsokas et al, 2014;Leucci, 2017, 2019).…”
Section: Archaeological Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drahor (Drahor et al, 1996) have observed that SP anomalies are produced by burnt pits, well and walls, kilns and in areas where chemical changes are high. Therefore it can be concluded that the SP method can especially be useful in prehistoric sites.…”
Section: Self Potential Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%