2017
DOI: 10.4135/9781071802779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
272
0
33

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
272
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a common terminology across all disciplines could help encourage cross-disciplinary research, which has helped move research forward in the past (e.g., Century et al, 2012). Other related and unrelated fields have also found having a common terminology important in order to facilitate high-quality research (e.g., General Psychology: Edmonds & Kennedy, 2016;Software Measurement: Garcia et al, 2006;Species Diversity: Jurasinski et al, 2009;Animal Behavior: Kalueff et al, 2013). It is possible that having a common terminology or language across all disciplines that study play can help move the field forward to understanding this complex behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a common terminology across all disciplines could help encourage cross-disciplinary research, which has helped move research forward in the past (e.g., Century et al, 2012). Other related and unrelated fields have also found having a common terminology important in order to facilitate high-quality research (e.g., General Psychology: Edmonds & Kennedy, 2016;Software Measurement: Garcia et al, 2006;Species Diversity: Jurasinski et al, 2009;Animal Behavior: Kalueff et al, 2013). It is possible that having a common terminology or language across all disciplines that study play can help move the field forward to understanding this complex behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research is frequently perceived as less rigorous than quantitative methods (Buckler, 2008;Cawthorne, 2001), but in reality, both methods are rigorous; they are just employed to answer different research questions (Choy, 2014;Kraska, 2008). Their complimentary aspects are further demonstrated in the value of using mixed methods (Edmonds & Kennedy, 2017;Gall et al, 2007). Therefore, it would be a rather incorrect perception to demonstrate bias toward either method.…”
Section: Literature Review Research and The Scientific Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The researchers' primary purpose was to explore individual women's subjective perceptions of their own experiences as they relate to the world of domestic work as social phenomena. The shared multiple lived realities experienced by the participants within their specific social existence remained central as we endeavoured to uncover and interpret the complexities of the meaning-making associated with the human experience (Edmonds & Kennedy, 2013;Fox & Bayat, 2013).…”
Section: Aim Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%