1978
DOI: 10.1080/00385417.1978.10640262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Appraisal of the Soviet Concept of the Territorial Production Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occasional critical notes on the model (e.g., Alampiev, 1960; Moshkin, 1962) had failed to reach sufficient momentum to introduce radical changes to the paradigm, and most scholars maintained the paradigm by developing or reinterpreting theoretical and functional elements of the template (Lis, 1975; Privalovskaya, 1979; Probst, 1977) without questioning its foundational principles or underlying assumptions (Pokshishevskiy, 1979). The Central Committee had officially initiated construction projects of new TPCs in its Basic Guidelines for the Development of the National Economy in 1976–80 , which cemented the position of the model as the principal economic geographical model and as a practical planning tool for the rest of the Soviet period (Linge, Karaska, & Ian Hamilton, 1978). The Soviet articles analyzing the prospects of the TPC plans from this period (e.g., Kosmachev & Losyakova, 1976; Shotskiy, 1976; Sochinskaya, 1977) reflect a consensus regarding the role of the TPC model as an integral part of the projected technological trajectories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasional critical notes on the model (e.g., Alampiev, 1960; Moshkin, 1962) had failed to reach sufficient momentum to introduce radical changes to the paradigm, and most scholars maintained the paradigm by developing or reinterpreting theoretical and functional elements of the template (Lis, 1975; Privalovskaya, 1979; Probst, 1977) without questioning its foundational principles or underlying assumptions (Pokshishevskiy, 1979). The Central Committee had officially initiated construction projects of new TPCs in its Basic Guidelines for the Development of the National Economy in 1976–80 , which cemented the position of the model as the principal economic geographical model and as a practical planning tool for the rest of the Soviet period (Linge, Karaska, & Ian Hamilton, 1978). The Soviet articles analyzing the prospects of the TPC plans from this period (e.g., Kosmachev & Losyakova, 1976; Shotskiy, 1976; Sochinskaya, 1977) reflect a consensus regarding the role of the TPC model as an integral part of the projected technological trajectories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imprinted processes describe the occurrence of imprints and adherent mechanisms, which take place during the sensitive period. Marquis & Tilcsik (2013) One contributing factor to this was the introduction mathematical models into economic geography in the 1950s and cybernetic movement (Peters 2016), which found congruent elements with application of TPC theory (Linge, Karaska & Hamilton 1978). However, another source of imprinting stems from sequence of events prior to the Party Congress.…”
Section: Imprinted Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, many Soviet economists considered that the management model based on decentralization principle and sectoral ministries was ineffective (Kuznetsov & Mezhevik 2017). TPCs received official endorsement from the Central Committee in its Basic Guidelines for the Development of the National Economy in 1976-80, which alongside the establishment of associated science institute in Novosibirsk cemented its position as the principal economic geographical model and as a practical planning tool(Linge, Karaska & Hamilton 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation