2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-022-02815-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An appraisal of Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It became obvious that several species, species-complexes, and singletons could not be identified to species level, due to the absence of reference material, whereas other clades contained sequences with name applications of different species concepts and therefor reflected polyphyletic species groups (Steinhagen et al 2019a(Steinhagen et al , 2022c. Such difficulties of name applications have been recently discussed for several of the most commonly applied molecular markers that are used in Ulva identification and delimitation (Tran et al 2022). One large problem during molecular identification is the inconsistency of species name applications to sequences uploaded to genetic repositories such as GenBank and the reality that often sequence names are not updated in said databases once the taxonomy or systematics of respective species have changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It became obvious that several species, species-complexes, and singletons could not be identified to species level, due to the absence of reference material, whereas other clades contained sequences with name applications of different species concepts and therefor reflected polyphyletic species groups (Steinhagen et al 2019a(Steinhagen et al , 2022c. Such difficulties of name applications have been recently discussed for several of the most commonly applied molecular markers that are used in Ulva identification and delimitation (Tran et al 2022). One large problem during molecular identification is the inconsistency of species name applications to sequences uploaded to genetic repositories such as GenBank and the reality that often sequence names are not updated in said databases once the taxonomy or systematics of respective species have changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species rich genus Ulva encompasses > 550 species names, including several described subspecies, varieties, and forms (Guiry and Guiry 2022). During the last decade, several new species have been described (Chen et al 2015;Phillips et al 2016;Krupnik et al 2018;Lagourgue et al 2022) and allegedly well-defined species concepts have been taxonomically revised (Hughey et al 2019(Hughey et al , 2022Steinhagen et al 2019a, b;Fort et al 2022;Tran et al 2022). Today, 85 species are currently regarded taxonomically valid and > 70 species are declared with an uncertain taxonomic status (Guiry and Guiry 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations