2020
DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for broad‐scale predictive soil properties mapping in low‐relief areas based on responses to solar radiation

Abstract: In low‐relief areas, easily observed landscape features such as terrain and vegetation often do not spatially co‐vary with soil conditions to the level that they can be effectively used in predictive soil mapping. This paper proposes an approach to predicting soil spatial variation over such areas at a coarse resolution by constructing environmental covariates from the dynamic feedbacks of land surface in response to solar radiation. These feedbacks are captured by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bioclimatic factors used in the World-Clim dataset were BIO01-BIO10, which included the annual mean temperature (BIO01), mean diurnal range (BIO02), isothermality (BIO03), temperature seasonality (BIO04), maximum temperature of the warmest month (BIO05), minimum temperature of the cold month (BIO06), temperature annual range (BIO07), mean temperature of the wettest quarter (BIO08), mean temperature of the driest quarter (BIO09), and mean temperature of the warmest quarter (BIO10) (Table 1). These factors were selected to examine the potential impact of climate on hydrothermal changes and capture feedback information through remote sensing [18,19], which could be subsequently utilized for deducing land features. Furthermore, the study considered the dry-wet transition features of the local land surface.…”
Section: Construction Of a Water-thermal-spectral Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bioclimatic factors used in the World-Clim dataset were BIO01-BIO10, which included the annual mean temperature (BIO01), mean diurnal range (BIO02), isothermality (BIO03), temperature seasonality (BIO04), maximum temperature of the warmest month (BIO05), minimum temperature of the cold month (BIO06), temperature annual range (BIO07), mean temperature of the wettest quarter (BIO08), mean temperature of the driest quarter (BIO09), and mean temperature of the warmest quarter (BIO10) (Table 1). These factors were selected to examine the potential impact of climate on hydrothermal changes and capture feedback information through remote sensing [18,19], which could be subsequently utilized for deducing land features. Furthermore, the study considered the dry-wet transition features of the local land surface.…”
Section: Construction Of a Water-thermal-spectral Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [17] used Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery to acquire short-term ground dynamic feedback (6-7 d) after heavy rains, constructed a suite of environmental covariates, and validated the effectiveness of these variables in discriminating soil texture patterns. Liu et al [18] constructed environmental covariates based on a dynamic feedback response to solar radiation. The covariates were derived from the time-series of temperatures acquired from MODIS at four periods (1:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m., 1:30 p.m., and 10:30 p.m.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of remote sensing data for mapping each of the indicators and indices of different models has been expanded. For example, remote sensing indices such as spectral vegetation index, soil property index, and precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks (PERSIAN) and rain se efficiency (RUE) have been widely used in vegetation (Venter, Scott, Desmet, & Hoffman, 2020), soil (Liu et al, 2020), climate (Satgé et al, 2017), and management (Del Barrio, Puigdefabregas, Sanjuan, Stellmes, & Ruiz, 2010) studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%