2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-016-0918-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for estimating time-variable rates from geodetic time series

Abstract: There has been considerable research in the literature focused on computing and forecasting sea-level changes in terms of constant trends or rates. The Antarctic ice sheet is one of the main contributors to sea-level change with highly uncertain rates of glacial thinning and accumulation. Geodetic observing systems such as the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and the Global Positioning System (GPS) are routinely used to estimate these trends. In an effort to improve the accuracy and reliability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of temporal correlated noise in the state vector was found to give superior results compared to the KF of Davis et al (2012) who did not include this type of noise. We concur with Didova et al (2016) that the search for the optimal values of the variances of the temporal correlated noise and the random walk part of the seasonal signal is a complex problem. However, when this task is well done, the KF is able to estimate better the varying seasonal signal at normal to high noise levels than the afore-mentioned methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The addition of temporal correlated noise in the state vector was found to give superior results compared to the KF of Davis et al (2012) who did not include this type of noise. We concur with Didova et al (2016) that the search for the optimal values of the variances of the temporal correlated noise and the random walk part of the seasonal signal is a complex problem. However, when this task is well done, the KF is able to estimate better the varying seasonal signal at normal to high noise levels than the afore-mentioned methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Then, we implemented both filters, but after tuning the filter of Davis et al (2012), we could not obtain misfits lower than 0.21 and 1.15 mm for the 1 and 10 mm/ year 0.25 noise levels, respectively. These values are larger than the values we obtained using the filter of Didova et al (2016). Therefore, the latter was used in this research.…”
Section: Parameters Of Cp Ssa and Kfmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations