An approach for finding proper packet size in IPv6 networks

Genkov, Delyan

doi:10.1145/2023607.2023681

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, the design of a graphical display with two-positional solenoids will significantly reduce the energy consumption since it will be consumed only by turning the solenoids on and off while the plunger is detained by permanent magnets (Simeonov & Simeonova, 2013). A block diagram of a solenoid based display with resolution 16х16 taxels (Genkov, 2011) for visually impaired people is shown in Figure 2.…”

Section: Tactile Graphical Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

Technologies for the Introduction of Digitalized Cultural Heritage to Visually Impaired People

Simeonova

Stewart

Gospodinova

2019

DiPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the place of technologies and digitalization for the creation of an opportunity for visual impaired people to become acquainted with the cultural heritage not only as text and as sound but also images. A concept for hardware realization of graphic tactile display is outlined based on a technology using tactile actuators bi-stable, solenoids and PIC based control board. The selected algorithm for series activation of each row of display allows using minimal number of active components to set and reset the solenoids and make possible the representation of an image, described additionally through text to sound readings of an object description.

show abstract

Section: Tactile Graphical Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

Technologies for the Introduction of Digitalized Cultural Heritage to Visually Impaired People

Simeonova

Stewart

Gospodinova

2019

DiPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, some existing features in IPv4 are replaced with newly enhanced features in IPv6, and this has changed the packet layout of IPv6 making it different from IPv4 packet layout. The distinction in the packet arrangement or structure of the two protocols implies that IPv6 traffic routing will never again be bolstered by regular routing protocols that exist in IPv4; consequently, new directing conventions that will be good to route IPv6 packets must be utilized [1]. Routing insecurity is observed to be one of the real reasons for network debasement in the performance of internet services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of OSPFv3/IS-IS and RIPng/IS-IS Mixed Protocols for Real-Time Applications in IPv6 Communication Networks

Asante

Essah

2021

AJRCoS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In network designs, the decision made when implementing dynamic routing protocols is very paramount to the speed of the network. To make the best choice of protocol to deploy, several decisions has to be considered. Usually, these decisions are made based on the performance of the routing protocol with respect to some quantitative parameters. The protocol that performs better than other protocols involved in a research is selected for routing purposes. In this research paper, performance comparison of two mixed protocols namely OSPFv3/IS-IS and RIPng/IS-IS in IPv6 network has been made. Their performances have been measured and comparison made by simulation using Riverbed Modeller Academic Edition. The objective of this paper is mainly to determine which of the mixed protocols will be more suitable to route traffic in IPv6 network. The main motivation for this paper is to find out if the difference in the routing algorithms of RIPng and IS-IS will offset and produce a better performance than a combination of two routing protocols of the same routing algorithm (thus OSPFv3 and IS-IS). To achieve this paper’s objective, the simulation was divided into two scenarios. The first scenario was an OSPFv3/IS-IS configured IPv6 network topology. The second scenario is a copy of the first scenario but configured with RIPng/IS-IS. The two scenarios were simulated and the effect of using each of the scenarios to separately route the selected applications was measured and recorded. The performance comparison of the mixed protocols was based on the following quantitative parameters: database query response time, database query traffics received, email upload/download response time, ftp upload/download response time, ftp traffic received, http page response time, remote login response timeandIPv6 traffics dropped. The results obtained from the simulation indicated that RIPng/IS-IS scenario performed better in email download/upload response time, remote login response time, IPv6 traffics dropped and remote login response time while the mixture of OSPFv3/IS-IS performed better in database query response time, database query traffics received, ftp download/upload response time, ftp traffic received and http page response time. Hence OSPFv3/IS-IS is the better option when the choice is between RIPng/IS-IS and OSPFv3/IS-IS for most of the quantitative parameters involved in this paper. This is because the combination of RIPng and IS-IS took a longer time to converge, affecting the speed on the network scenario. The time the RIPng/IS-IS combination took to access most of the application servers is slower than that of OSPFv3/IS-IS network scenario. On the basis of database query and ftp traffics received, the simulation results showed that network configured with OSPFv3/IS-IS performs better than RIPng/IS-IS. This is because the OSPFv3/IS-IS received the highest database and ftp traffics. The mixture of OSPFv3/IS-IS sent and received more application packets because it had very high throughput values which had an effect on the total quantity of application traffics received. Although the OSPFv3/IS-IS network scenario recorded the highest database and ftp traffics, this could not affect its speed to become lower than the RIPng/IS-IS scenario.

show abstract

“…However, some existing features in IPv4 are replaced with newly enhanced features in IPv6, and this has changed the packet layout of IPv6 making it different from IPv4 packet layout. The difference in packet structure between the two protocols means that routing traffic in IPv6 will no longer be supported by the conventional routing protocols used in IPv4 [1]. Hence new routing protocols that are compatible with IPv6 must be used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Routing Implementation Decision between OSPFv3 and IS–IS in IPv6 Networks

Evans¹,

Asante²,

Amponsah³

2016

CAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The choice of a suitable routing protocol for implementation is an important part of every network design. During routing protocol implementation, several decisions are considered in order to select the best protocol for deployment. These decisions are usually taken on the basis of some quantitative parameters that are used to determine which protocol will perform better than others whenever there are different routing protocols available. The routing protocol with the best performance in terms of these parameters is considered the most suitable protocol and is selected for implementation. In this paper, performance of two routing protocols (OSPFv3 and IS-IS) for IPv6 has been measured and compared by simulation using Riverbed Modeler Academic Edition. Performance evaluation is based on convergence duration, IPv6 packets dropped, throughput, link utilization and queuing delay as the main parameters. The main objective of this paper is to compare both protocols and to evaluate their performance in order to determine which of them will be the more suitable one for routing network traffic in IPv6. In order to achieve the objective of this paper, two scenarios were used: OSPFv3 scenario and IS-IS scenario. Both scenarios were simulated against the chosen parameters. Overall, simulation results have shown that IS-IS performed better than OSPFv3 on the basis of convergence time, link utilization and queuing delay. OSPFv3 on the other hand performed better than IS-IS on the basis of network throughput. On the basis of IPv6 traffic dropped, IS-IS performed better than OSPFv3 when the simulation started. However, before the simulation ended, OSPFv3 dropped the least IPv6 traffic.

show abstract

An approach for finding proper packet size in IPv6 networks

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Technologies for the Introduction of Digitalized Cultural Heritage to Visually Impaired People

Technologies for the Introduction of Digitalized Cultural Heritage to Visually Impaired People

Comparative Analysis of OSPFv3/IS-IS and RIPng/IS-IS Mixed Protocols for Real-Time Applications in IPv6 Communication Networks

Dynamic Routing Implementation Decision between OSPFv3 and IS–IS in IPv6 Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About