2016
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for identifying cryptic barriers to gene flow that limit species' geographic ranges

Abstract: Species' geographic range limits are most often not demarcated by obvious dispersal barriers. Poor-quality habitat at the edge of a species' range can prevent range expansion by preventing outward migration or through reducing adaptive potential resulting from decreased genetic diversity. We identified habitat variables that constrain gene flow across the entire geographic range of an endemic salamander (Ambystoma barbouri) in the eastern United States, and we tested whether increased resistance resulting from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured landscape variables both at natal sites and along the migration path for each population using the Spatial Analyst Toolbox in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA). For natal‐site variables, we measured each landscape value as the mean of a 5‐km buffer around the collection site to account for natal habitat variation (Micheletti & Storfer, ). Migration path measurements, on the other hand, encompass a long geographic extent, only some of which is shared between populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measured landscape variables both at natal sites and along the migration path for each population using the Spatial Analyst Toolbox in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA). For natal‐site variables, we measured each landscape value as the mean of a 5‐km buffer around the collection site to account for natal habitat variation (Micheletti & Storfer, ). Migration path measurements, on the other hand, encompass a long geographic extent, only some of which is shared between populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid type I error in downstream analyses, we removed landscape measurements with a pairwise correlation >0.75 (Asuero, Sayago, & Gonzalez, ), retaining biologically relevant variables per previous salmonid studies (Hecht et al., ; Olsen et al., ). This initial filter was intended to remove highly correlated variables and retain putatively informative variables (McGaughran, Morgan, & Sommer, ; Micheletti & Storfer, ) for further analyses with subsequent identification of autocorrelation. After eliminating highly correlated variables, we ultimately retained 45 measurements across 19 unique landscape variables (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if dispersal is limited due to harsh habitat conditions or fragmentation, genetic drift may reduce genetic diversity below a threshold required for adaptation (Polechová, 2018;Polechová & Barton, 2015). While there is considerable empirical evidence supporting the first two hypotheses (Bridle et al, 2009;Hargreaves et al, 2013;Micheletti & Storfer, 2015, 2017Sexton et al, 2011), empirical tests of the third hypothesis have lagged behind theoretical considerations, largely due to constraints of adequately sampling species' geographic ranges (Eckert et al, 2008;Sexton et al, 2009). Further, such studies necessitate a dual-pronged approach that requires estimation of range-wide gene flow and overcoming the challenges of conducting reciprocal transplant experiments across a large geographic extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene flow between fish and fishless populations resulted in overactive and less camouflaged larvae from fish populations, making them more susceptible to fish predation (Storfer et al, 1999;Storfer & Sih, 1998). On a larger spatial scale, edge populations tend to have smaller effective population sizes in A. barbouri and range-wide environmental conditions between the centre and edges differ (Micheletti & Storfer, 2015, 2017.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, genetic monitoring can be an efficient approach to obtaining reliable demographic information (De Barba et al , Stansbury et al ). Genetic data can help identify species and individuals, provide estimates of population parameters, and offer insights into space use and connectivity (Schwartz et al , Paetkau et al , Mumma et al , Micheletti and Storfer ). Measures of relatedness and genetic diversity can be used to reconstruct pedigrees, gain greater understanding of mating systems, assess population viability, and track quantitative traits (Thomas and Hill , DeWoody , Lucia and Keane , Putnam and Ivy , Gooley et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%