2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1211.6340
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach of Improving Students Academic Performance by using k means clustering algorithm and Decision tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of these studies have utilized data mining techniques, particularly classification algorithms, to enhance the quality of higher education systems and predict student performance. In this section, a number of the related studies, especially those focusing on the application of the and classification in estimating the academic performance of the students, are presented [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. For instance, Qasem, Emad, and Mustafa [32] employed the CRISP framework to evaluate students' data in C++ courses, comparing classifiers such as , and Naive Bayes .…”
Section: Related Work Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several of these studies have utilized data mining techniques, particularly classification algorithms, to enhance the quality of higher education systems and predict student performance. In this section, a number of the related studies, especially those focusing on the application of the and classification in estimating the academic performance of the students, are presented [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. For instance, Qasem, Emad, and Mustafa [32] employed the CRISP framework to evaluate students' data in C++ courses, comparing classifiers such as , and Naive Bayes .…”
Section: Related Work Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorina Kabakchieva [40] compared algorithms to predict student performance, classifying students as strong or weak, with the neural network achieving high accuracy for the strong class. Shovon and Mahfuza [41] proposed a hybrid approach combining clustering and classification to categorize students into high, medium, and low standards and make informed decisions about their academic performance, ultimately enhancing their final examination results. These studies collectively demonstrate the versatility of and classification algorithms in addressing various facets of student performance and academic success, aiding both educators and educational institutions in improving their educational processes and outcomes.…”
Section: Related Work Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their pivotal role extends to the identification of group characteristics, exploration of relationships between variables, and application in predicting various educational outcomes, including student performance. Jorda and Raqueno [11] underscore the significance of diverse decision tree algorithms such as C&R Tree, CHAID, C 5.0, and QUEST, emphasizing their role in the development of classification systems [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also exploited to group common learning profiles of different students so that a learning policy could be established and applied to particular groups for further improvement [52]. Clustering in learning management systems and e-portals can also help form groups of successful or struggling students when there is no labeling provided by the portals or management systems [53].…”
Section: Association Rules and Clustering In Academic Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%