2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach on Multilateral Automated Negotiation

Abstract: In E-commerce, numbers of transactions are increasing day by day in B2B and B2C trade. Online negotiation is possible because of automated negotiation. In this paper, we propose linear programming and pattern matching based multilateral automated negotiation system and study some multilateral system with several methods. We have studied fuzzy inference logic based system, multithreading based automated negotiation system, linear programming based system and genetic algorithm based system and we have compared s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequence of negotiation processes between the set of ITBAs={ITBA 1 , ITBA 2 , …, ITBA n } and SPAs={SPA 1 , SPA 2 , …, SPA m } can be formulated by the set of offers or counteroffers ρ τ ={ρ τ (1) , ρ τ (2) , ρ τ (3) , ρ τ (4) , …, ρ τ(k-1) , ρ τ(k) } exchanged concerning period τ. Here, the set ρ τ ={ρ τ (1) , ρ τ (3) , …, ρ τ(k-1) } denotes the sequence of offers generated by the ITBAs and the set ρ τ ={ρ τ (2) , ρ τ (4) , …, ρ τ(k) } denotes the sequence of counteroffers received by the ITBAs from the respective SPAs. Each negotiation offer ρ τ (1) is generated by varying the preferences of 'n' number of negotiation attributes ρ x(1) ={ρ x(1)←[0,1] , ρ x(2)←[0,1] , …, ρ x(n)←[0,1] }.…”
Section: Formulation Of Negotiation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sequence of negotiation processes between the set of ITBAs={ITBA 1 , ITBA 2 , …, ITBA n } and SPAs={SPA 1 , SPA 2 , …, SPA m } can be formulated by the set of offers or counteroffers ρ τ ={ρ τ (1) , ρ τ (2) , ρ τ (3) , ρ τ (4) , …, ρ τ(k-1) , ρ τ(k) } exchanged concerning period τ. Here, the set ρ τ ={ρ τ (1) , ρ τ (3) , …, ρ τ(k-1) } denotes the sequence of offers generated by the ITBAs and the set ρ τ ={ρ τ (2) , ρ τ (4) , …, ρ τ(k) } denotes the sequence of counteroffers received by the ITBAs from the respective SPAs. Each negotiation offer ρ τ (1) is generated by varying the preferences of 'n' number of negotiation attributes ρ x(1) ={ρ x(1)←[0,1] , ρ x(2)←[0,1] , …, ρ x(n)←[0,1] }.…”
Section: Formulation Of Negotiation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex and timeconsuming multilateral negotiation was introduced to dramatically improve the number of negotiation consensus among the participants. It makes the predictive decision making in the agent's negotiation strategy using fuzzy inference logic for maximizing their utility value [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their Applied Computer Systems _________________________________________________________________________________________________2020/25 21 work presents a comparison of some negotiation methods and proposes an automated negotiation system by using linear programming and matching based systems [28]. A model is described for the agents that assists them to complete a successful deal in e-commerce by assuming the aim of ecommerce domain and the goal of the agents [29]. A computational model is described for the e-commerce negotiation that covers the negotiation protocols, issues, strategies and behaviour configuration mechanism [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the challenge for the users in terms of quality-oriented selection of their required services, Hashmi et al [ 16 ] presented a social network-based trust framework ( SNRNeg ) and proposed an end-to-end automated negotiation approach of Genetic Algorithm-based Web service for modeling dependency relationships among the Quality of Service (QoS) component of Web services with static environment. Patrikar et al [ 17 ] proposed a linear programming and pattern matching based multilateral automated negotiation system and studied some multilateral system with several methods. To find a proficient mechanism helping an agent to decide under which conditions to accept opponent’s offer in a bilateral automated negotiation, Baarslag et al [ 18 ] compared the performance of various acceptance conditions in combination with a broad range of bidding strategies and negotiation scenarios, and then proposed new acceptance conditions meanwhile demonstrated their advantages relative to other conditions by numerical experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%