2012
DOI: 10.3233/wor-2012-0163-240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to aircraft seat comfort using interface pressure mapping

Abstract: The objective of the present study is to propose a method to dynamically evaluate discomfort of a passenger seat by measuring the interface pressure between the occupant and the seat during the performance of the most common activities of a typical flight 1 . This article reports the results of resting and reading studies performed in a simulator that represents the interior of a commercial aircraft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is may be caused by many other mediating factors that influence OCI (i.e., posture and movement). Prior research observed that activity analysis in combination with the pressure mapping evaluation goes beyond the static analysis currently used for measuring comfort of aircraft passenger seats (Ciaccia & Sznelwar, 2012). Another possible explanation is that the sample is small (n = 11), and composed of very young people (23-28 years old Second, the model presented in this study was obtained using data with very specific characteristics (i.e., humidity, atmospheric pressure, and vibration was different from the real flight environment), and the sample is very limited (n = 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is may be caused by many other mediating factors that influence OCI (i.e., posture and movement). Prior research observed that activity analysis in combination with the pressure mapping evaluation goes beyond the static analysis currently used for measuring comfort of aircraft passenger seats (Ciaccia & Sznelwar, 2012). Another possible explanation is that the sample is small (n = 11), and composed of very young people (23-28 years old Second, the model presented in this study was obtained using data with very specific characteristics (i.e., humidity, atmospheric pressure, and vibration was different from the real flight environment), and the sample is very limited (n = 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research about home furniture, Teraoka, Mitsuya, and Noro (1994) also found differences between tall and short people: in comparison with tall people, short people had less foot contact with the floor, or less contact with the backrest in combination with a slumped posture. Ciaccia and Sznelwar (2012) concluded that the participants in their study adopted very similar postures for both reading and resting in order to avoid discomfort, despite having different anthropometric characteristics. However, this was based on an observational study with only five participants (Ciaccia and Sznelwar 2012).…”
Section: Effects Of Anthropometry On Posture and Movementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ciaccia and Sznelwar (2012) concluded that the participants in their study adopted very similar postures for both reading and resting in order to avoid discomfort, despite having different anthropometric characteristics. However, this was based on an observational study with only five participants (Ciaccia and Sznelwar 2012). In a driving simulation experiment, Park et al (2013) found a relationship between upper body posture and gender; most of the female drivers preferred a slouched or erect posture, while most of the male drivers preferred a slouched or reclined posture.…”
Section: Effects Of Anthropometry On Posture and Movementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lijmbach et al [7] contrasted the differences between elderly and young passengers by analyzing video recordings of the in and egress in seat rows. Ciaccia and Sznelwar [8] assessed dynamically a passengers' discomfort by measuring the interface pressure between the occupant and the seat during the performance of resting and reading of a typical flight. Tan et al [9] evaluated the seat comfort by analyzing sleeping posture of passengers on long haul.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%