2016
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-16-255-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to build an event set of European windstorms based on ECMWF EPS

Abstract: Abstract. The properties of European windstorms under present climate conditions are estimated on the basis of surface wind forecasts from the European Centre for MediumRange Weather Forecast (ECMWF) Ensemble Prediction System (EPS). While the EPS is designed to provide forecast information of the range of possible weather developments starting from the observed state of weather, we use its archive in a climatological context. It provides a large number of modifications of observed storm events and includes st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental idea is to identify windstorms in the 51 members of the ECMWF System 4 seasonal forecast system (Molteni et al , 2011) and treat each member as a physically consistent realisation of a potential reality. This approach is similar to Osinski et al () who used the ECMWF EPS model to build a windstorm “hazard set.” This will lead to a substantial increase in the available physically consistent sample of extreme events. The annual losses for four different European countries for every member of the ensemble are estimated from the tracked windstorm events with the help of the open source natural catastrophe damage model CLIMADA (Bresch, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fundamental idea is to identify windstorms in the 51 members of the ECMWF System 4 seasonal forecast system (Molteni et al , 2011) and treat each member as a physically consistent realisation of a potential reality. This approach is similar to Osinski et al () who used the ECMWF EPS model to build a windstorm “hazard set.” This will lead to a substantial increase in the available physically consistent sample of extreme events. The annual losses for four different European countries for every member of the ensemble are estimated from the tracked windstorm events with the help of the open source natural catastrophe damage model CLIMADA (Bresch, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental idea is to identify windstorms in the 51 members of the ECMWF System 4 seasonal forecast system (Molteni et al, 2011) and treat each member as a physically consistent realisation of a potential reality. This approach is similar to Osinski et al (2016) who used the ECMWF EPS model to build a windstorm "hazard set." This will lead to a substantial increase in the available physically consistent sample of extreme events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 51 members are used in a climate archive context similar to Osinski et al (2016), thus every member is treated as an individual artificial reality of 31 years resulting in more than 1500 years of physically consistent data. As the forecast skill for very high local wind speeds is relatively small (Walz et al (2018b)), the members can be seen as statistically independent since statistical dependence and forecast skill can be seen as equivalent.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the uncertainty of high impact windstorms in terms of frequency and severity however, the amount of data is still too sparse to produce reasonable confidence intervals. Similar to Osinski et al (2016) in which the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System (EPS) is used as a data archive for creating a windstorm catalogue, this study approaches the retrospective predictions of ECMWF Seasonal Forecast System 4 (Molteni et al, 2011) as an archive of potential windstorms. Clearly none of the windstorms found in these forecasts ever happened, however each of them represents one possible physical consistent realisation of a potential reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can be due to a different dynamical evolution of the storm or due to different tracks in the atmospheric model members (compare Osinski et al, 2016), leading to differences in the position. Already a slight change in the track of the storm can provoke large differences in the maximum if looking at a specific location in such a high resolution.…”
Section: Wave Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%