IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, 2003. IEMDC'03.
DOI: 10.1109/iemdc.2003.1210672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to compute saturated induction motors in steady state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition of the effective magnetic permeability, as used in the previous works of the authors [9,14,16,17], is the reference point for the considerations presented herein:…”
Section: Effective Magnetic Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Definition of the effective magnetic permeability, as used in the previous works of the authors [9,14,16,17], is the reference point for the considerations presented herein:…”
Section: Effective Magnetic Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the above-mentioned approach essentially involves the problem of modeling the nonlinearity of the magnetic materials. Taking this into account in the monoharmonic field models based on the use of the complex magnetic vector potential method is not a new task and it has been described to date in several works, including [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. They propose several different methods of defining the so-called effective magnetic permeability based, among others, on the development of nonlinear waveforms in the Fourier series [14,16], averaging the magnetic reluctivity [10,15,16] or equivalence of energy stored in ferromagnetic components [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Five formulations taken from the literature are as follows. The ones based on the fundamental component of Fourier series expansion of magnetic flux density or magnetic field intensity are as follows: [19] μnormalenormalfnormalf1()Heff=2π0πμnormalDnormalC()Hnormalenormalfnormalf0.25emsin0.25emαsin20.25emαdα ${\mu }_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}1}\left({H}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}\right)=\frac{2}{\pi }\underset{0{}}{\overset{\pi }{\int }}{\mu }_{\mathrm{D}\mathrm{C}}\left({H}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}\,\mathrm{sin}\,\alpha \right){\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\,\alpha d\alpha $ and μnormalenormalfnormalf2()Beff=2π0πsin2αμDCBeffsinαdα1 ${\mu }_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}2}\left({B}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}\right)={\left(\frac{2}{\pi }\underset{0{}}{\overset{\pi }{\int }}\frac{{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\,\alpha }{{\mu }_{DC}\left({B}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{f}}\,\mathrm{sin}\,\alpha \right)}d\alpha \right)}^{-1}$ …”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%